A blog on issues affecting Australia's newsagents, media and small business generally. More ...

decoupling

What Happens to the Newsagent Who Does Not Decouple

If you have happened across this post out of context: I have been suggesting to newsagents for some time that they need to decouple their business from the newsagency channel given the decay of the channel and the disrespect with which it is help by news outlets and others. Staying as a newsagency its not an option in my opinion.

I have written about why to decouple and how to decouple. This post is about the path where you change nothing.

Not decoupling does not feel like a decision, and I think that is the trap. Nobody sits down and chooses decline. Every day you’;re busy doing what you know, only looking at the next step. The reorders go in and the lottery counter pays the bills. From the inside it feels like stability.

Let me show you what it actually looks like, from a real shop I reviewed recently. I will not name it.

Just under a million dollars through the till, in a wealthy village where the cafes are full every weekend. Sounds healthy. Underneath, 41 per cent of gross profit came from the lottery counter, at ten cents in the dollar. Add papers, magazines and agency lines, and more than half the shop’s profit was controlled by companies that do not know the owner’s name.

The gift department, in one of the best gifting towns in its state, sold nineteen dollars a week. Not a typo. The garden category, in a town full of acreage gardens, did twenty-seven dollars for the year. Nobody decided any of that. It happened one reorder at a time, over years, while the lottery counter quietly paid the bills.

Play it forward a few years and the exposure starts collecting. The Lottery Corporation that controls that counter told the sharemarket recently it is reviewing retailer commissions. Papers will stop at some point, and publishers will not consult you first. Australia Post reshapes its network on its own timetable. Every one of those decisions gets made in a boardroom you will never sit in, and the shop that has not decoupled absorbs each hit straight in the profit line, because nothing else in the building grew while there was time and money to grow it.

The traffic leaks away alongside the profit. The paper customer ages. The ticket buyer drifts online. The shop never built its own reasons for people to walk in, so when the inherited reasons fade, that is that.

Then comes the part I think about most: the exit. At some point every owner wants to sell. Nobody is queuing to buy a newsagency, and a shop earning most of its profit from declining agency lines is not a business a buyer can imagine owning. It is a job, attached to a lease. Many owners in this position do not sell. They close, and walk away from decades of work with a discounted value of the fixtures.

I want to be careful not to overdramatise, because the reality is quieter than that. There is no single bad year. Just a slow leak, and by the time it is obvious, the money and energy needed to transform have usually leaked out too.

The shop I described still has time. So does yours, probably. One afternoon with your sales data tells you which path you are on.

3 likes
newsagency of the future

Advice on How to Decouple Your Newsagency From the Channel: Five Jobs, Two Years

I have written plenty here about why I think newsagents need to decouple from the channel. The data points to less than ten years of life left in the traditional newsagency. The question I get asked most is how.

Decoupling is not a slogan and it is not a rebrand you order from a signwriter. It’s not restricted to any particular brand of newsagency either.

Decoupling is five jobs, done in order, over about two years. I watch newsXpress members do this work, so what follows is drawn from real shops.

Job one: find the number that is not yours. Go through your last full year and add up the gross profit from lines where somebody else sets the commission and can change the terms without asking you. Papers, magazines, lotteries, parcels, bill payments. That total, as a share of your whole GP, is your exposure. For a traditional newsagency it usually sits between half and three quarters, which shocks most owners the first time they see it. The goal is below a third. One afternoon with your POS data gets you the number.

Job two: make the floor tell the truth. Your floor is a budget. For each zone, note the share of space it takes and the gross profit it produces, divide one by the other, and sort. Most shops find a quarter of the floor producing five per cent of the profit. Quit the dead categories through a proper clearance, bank the cash, and give the space to what earns: cards, gifts, celebration. Put the papers at the back. I mean that literally. The paper customer will walk for them, and on the way they pass everything you actually make money on. Rerun the table quarterly. Move one bay each quarter.

Job three: replace the traffic before it leaves. This is the hard one, and I think it is where most transformations stall. I know of a shop with a terrific mix, gifts leading, print under ten per cent of GP, whose customer count still fell seven per cent last year. Changing what you sell does not by itself change why people come. Agency lines rented us traffic for a hundred years. Now you create it yourself. A loyalty program with real names and birthdays in it. A window that changes monthly, without fail. Small events. Local product, because the honey from ten minutes away brings in people Hallmark never will. Social media about what you unpacked this week. None of it is glamorous. All of it is weekly.

Job four: change the word. Only now do you change the sign. A rebrand on top of an unchanged shop is wallpaper. New trading name, new signage, and update your Google listing category from newsagency to gift shop, because that one field decides what searches you appear in. Check your lease first, since permitted use clauses can trip you up. Tell the story as growth: we have outgrown the old name. And do it while you are trading well. The worst time to rebrand is when you finally have to.

Job five: decouple the owner. A shop that runs out of your head is coupled to one more thing that will eventually leave. You. Document the routines. Give staff real departments with real numbers. Review the figures monthly like a board would. Nobody is queuing to buy a newsagency, but a profitable gift destination with owned traffic and clean numbers is a business a buyer can imagine owning. Decoupling and exit value are the same project.

Four numbers on the back room wall, checked monthly: customer transactions, the share of GP you control versus the share others control, GP per square metre, and the basket. If transactions and your owned share of GP are rising together, it is working.

You are done on the day no boardroom decision made without you can materially hurt your business. That is the whole test.

It starts with one afternoon and your own sales data.

Let me know if I can help: mark@newsxpress.com.au.

6 likes
Newsagency management

30 More Newsagents Are Decoupling From the Channel. Here Is What That Looks Like

Another 30 newsagents are actively working to decouple from the newsagency channel right now.

They are changing their business names, adjusting their product mix, deliberately relying less on legacy products for the future of their businesses.

This is not talk. It is work underway, in shops, right now.

For transparency: these are all newsXpress businesses, and plenty attended our recent conference in Perth, which focussed on decoupling. I am a Director of newsXpress, so read this post with that in mind.

The numbers are the numbers though, and I think they matter to anyone in this channel.

Thirty businesses moving at once is significant. In my experience, change in this channel usually happens one hesitant shop at a time. What we are seeing now is different. It is a group of retailers who have looked at the same evidence, reached the same conclusion, and started the same journey within weeks of each other.

The evidence is what I laid out in Perth. The data points to the traditional newsagency channel having less than ten years left. Papers, magazines and the other legacy lines that once defined these shops are in structural decline. That is not pessimism. It is arithmetic. And pretending otherwise helps nobody.

Decoupling is the response. Personally, I think it is essential.

It means separating the future of your business from the future of the channel. Becoming the best card and gift destination in your area, or the best of whatever you choose, rather than the local newsagency that also sells some gifts. And, what you choose can be anything, since you are not constrained by shingle expectations.

For the 30 businesses on this path, the work is practical. A new name that says what the shop is becoming, not what it was. Floor space rebalanced toward products that earn their keep. New traffic created through categories and marketing the shop controls, rather than traffic inherited from products in decline. It is roughly a two year job, done properly.

What encourages me most is the mindset. These retailers are not waiting for the channel to be saved. They are not waiting for a supplier, a distributor or a government to fix things. They are backing themselves.

I think we will look back on this period as the moment the smart end of the channel stopped identifying as newsagents and started building what comes next.

If you own a newsagency and this resonates, the first step costs nothing. Look at your sales data. Work out how much of your gross profit is controlled by others. Then decide whose future you want your business tied to. Theirs, or yours.

Footnote: The reality is that it is likely there are more than 30 newsagency businesses decoupling right now. The thirty I mention here are the ones I know about.

7 likes
newsagency of the future

Online sales: newsagents are doing $500,000 a year and more, and some are failing. The difference is choices.

There are newsagents in Australia right now doing $500,000 a year and more in online sales. I know a couple above $1 million.

I appreciate those numbers may feel out of touch, made up even. They are not, I can assure you.

What the numbers are is ame changing. The rent does not go up because you shipped 40 orders yesterday. The labour you already roster packs orders in the quiet hours you were paying for anyway. Online revenue makes the two biggest overheads in the business, the lease and wages, work harder. Same costs, more sales across them.

There is a second benefit that few talk about: A serious online business is an off ramp. If the landlord turns difficult, if the rent at renewal makes no sense, if the centre dies around you, a business with real online revenue can move, downsize or walk away from the lease and keep trading. A shop with no online presence has no such option. It negotiates from weakness.

We are way past “should I”

Should I sell online is a 2015 question. The newsagents doing this well settled it years ago. The question now is how, and that is where I see it go wrong.

Where online fails, and why it is on the owner

I know plenty of newsagents where online has failed. Money spent, site abandoned, owner telling anyone who will listen that online does not work for shops like ours.

In every case I have looked at, the failure came down to choices the owner made.

The most common failure that I see: they put their existing shop online, selling a bit of everything the shop carries. I have recommended against this for years. Nobody in Australia is searching for your shop name, and nobody wants to browse a general store online. Online shoppers search for a thing they want. A website wins by being the obvious answer for that thing.

The ones doing $500,000 and more are not newsagencies online. They are niche stores: a jigsaw store, a plush store, a collectables store, a pen store. One passion, deep range, named for the niche. The physical shop behind it is almost irrelevant to the shopper, and that is the point. I run several niche online stores myself and this is the model behind every one of them.

The second failure: they did not feed the website. A website is a shop. Left alone, it dies like one. New product, fresh content, updated photos, week in, week out. The owners winning online treat the website as a store with its own opening hours: always.

The third: they did it cheap. A template thrown up for a few hundred dollars, no thought to search, slow, clunky on a phone. You get what you pay for. Online you are ranked against the best in the country, not the shop across the road.

If you are starting now

Pick one niche where you already have supplier access and knowledge. Name the store for the niche, not for your shop. Go deep on range rather than wide. Commit to feeding it every week before you spend a dollar on it. And budget properly, because a website that cannot be found is a shed with no door.

The newsagents at $500,000 and beyond did not get there with a better shop. They got there with better decisions, made early and kept to.

Online is not the future for newsagents. It is the present, and it has been for a while. The only question left is whether the decisions you make are the ones that work.

6 likes
newsagency of the future

Halloween is the cheapest decouple test you will run this year

I have written plenty here about decoupling – newsagencies presenting as something else entirely, as presenting as not being a newsagency. Some owners are all in. Others want proof before they touch the fascia or the shop floor.

Halloween could be that proof, available for a small buy and a seven week run.

The numbers for Halloween in Australia are not small anymore

Last year Australians spent around $500 million on Halloween, up 11% on the year before, at an average of $103 per person celebrating. Around 4.8 million adults took part. Home decorating was close to 40% of the activity.

The fastest growing Halloween participation is among older Australians. The 50 to 64s and the over 65s are joining in bigger numbers each year. That is our existing customer base, the people already walking past your counter for a paper or a lotto ticket.

And this year, October 31 falls on a Saturday. Party night on a party night. Expect a strong year.

Where the gap is and where opportunity lies

The supermarkets and the discount variety stores own the low end. Bags of lollies, $3 spider webs, flimsy masks. They do it on price and they do it fine.

What most of them miss is the better end. Quality home decor people keep and bring out each year. The deeper party basket: table settings, props, lighting, the pieces that make a host’s house the one everyone talks about. A shopper planning a Halloween party on a Saturday night is not shopping on price. They are shopping for the look.

That gap is yours if you want it. Better product, curated, displayed with some theatre. Nobody expects it from a newsagency, which is exactly the point.

Do it fun or don’t do it

A half bay of packet decorations near the magazines proves nothing. That is a newsagency having a go at Halloween, and shoppers will read it that way.

Go the other way. Give it your window. Dress the team up in the last week. Build one display that makes kids drag their parents in. Post it, because Halloween content travels on social media like almost nothing else a local shop can make. Run something in-store: a colouring competition, a guess the lollies jar, trick or treat mapping for your town.

The product makes money. The theatre changes what people think your shop is. You want both, and the second one is worth more.

Why the risk is low

The buy is small next to a card or gift order. The season is short, so you learn fast. Sell through and you bank margin at a quiet time of year, right before Christmas floor moves. Left with stock? Core Halloween decor carries to next year without looking dated.

Compare that with the usual decouple questions: new fascia, new name, floor replan. Big decisions, big money. Halloween lets you test the underlying idea, that people will buy things from you they never associated with your shop, for a few hundred dollars.

Measure the right thing

Sales matter, but watch two other numbers. How many new faces the season brings in, and what else lands in the Halloween basket. If people who never shopped with you walk in because of a window, and they leave with decor plus a card plus a treat, you have your evidence.

That evidence is the answer to the question I hear most: would decoupling actually work for my shop, in my town?

Run the Halloween test, it’s low-cost.

5 likes
newsagency marketing