Magazine publishers need to be careful who they listen to
At a recent publishing event someone claiming to know was putting it about that newsagents were achieving a sell through rate of 50% for magazines.
The person reportedly saying this does not have access to data to backup the claim. I think it is their best guess. But they did not qualify it.
I see real sell through data for many newsagencies. While there are some with an overall sell through above 50%, there are many below. But this high level measure is unhelpful. The best measure is non weekly sell through as this is where newsagents are hurt the most.
Once I take out high volume weekly titles, the average magazine sell through I see for newsagents is close to 40%. That is, 60% of this stock fails to sell and is either recycled through the system at the newsagent’s expense or thrown out and wasted.
The MPA driven magazine code of conduct that is at the basis of a supply model trial with selected newsagents will not address this as the code does not go far enough. Replacing a failing title with another failing title allows a distributor to pass the code but fail the newsagent.
I want magazines I can sell. I’m happy for a 75% sell through – less than that does not work for me or the publishers I serve. The problem is that 75% does not work for the magazine distributors. hence the uncompetitive supply model forced on newsagents.
Yes, I hear you … blah blah blah – nothing new here. That’s true. But I feel better for writing it.
![image[5] copy](http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/image5-copy-300x283.png)
![image[3] copy](http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/image3-copy-300x285.png)
![image[1] copy](http://www.newsagencyblog.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/image1-copy-300x289.png)













