A blog on issues affecting Australia's newsagents, media and small business generally. More ...

retail transformation

What Happens to the Newsagent Who Does Not Decouple

If you have happened across this post out of context: I have been suggesting to newsagents for some time that they need to decouple their business from the newsagency channel given the decay of the channel and the disrespect with which it is help by news outlets and others. Staying as a newsagency its not an option in my opinion.

I have written about why to decouple and how to decouple. This post is about the path where you change nothing.

Not decoupling does not feel like a decision, and I think that is the trap. Nobody sits down and chooses decline. Every day you’;re busy doing what you know, only looking at the next step. The reorders go in and the lottery counter pays the bills. From the inside it feels like stability.

Let me show you what it actually looks like, from a real shop I reviewed recently. I will not name it.

Just under a million dollars through the till, in a wealthy village where the cafes are full every weekend. Sounds healthy. Underneath, 41 per cent of gross profit came from the lottery counter, at ten cents in the dollar. Add papers, magazines and agency lines, and more than half the shop’s profit was controlled by companies that do not know the owner’s name.

The gift department, in one of the best gifting towns in its state, sold nineteen dollars a week. Not a typo. The garden category, in a town full of acreage gardens, did twenty-seven dollars for the year. Nobody decided any of that. It happened one reorder at a time, over years, while the lottery counter quietly paid the bills.

Play it forward a few years and the exposure starts collecting. The Lottery Corporation that controls that counter told the sharemarket recently it is reviewing retailer commissions. Papers will stop at some point, and publishers will not consult you first. Australia Post reshapes its network on its own timetable. Every one of those decisions gets made in a boardroom you will never sit in, and the shop that has not decoupled absorbs each hit straight in the profit line, because nothing else in the building grew while there was time and money to grow it.

The traffic leaks away alongside the profit. The paper customer ages. The ticket buyer drifts online. The shop never built its own reasons for people to walk in, so when the inherited reasons fade, that is that.

Then comes the part I think about most: the exit. At some point every owner wants to sell. Nobody is queuing to buy a newsagency, and a shop earning most of its profit from declining agency lines is not a business a buyer can imagine owning. It is a job, attached to a lease. Many owners in this position do not sell. They close, and walk away from decades of work with a discounted value of the fixtures.

I want to be careful not to overdramatise, because the reality is quieter than that. There is no single bad year. Just a slow leak, and by the time it is obvious, the money and energy needed to transform have usually leaked out too.

The shop I described still has time. So does yours, probably. One afternoon with your sales data tells you which path you are on.

3 likes
newsagency of the future

Advice on How to Decouple Your Newsagency From the Channel: Five Jobs, Two Years

I have written plenty here about why I think newsagents need to decouple from the channel. The data points to less than ten years of life left in the traditional newsagency. The question I get asked most is how.

Decoupling is not a slogan and it is not a rebrand you order from a signwriter. It’s not restricted to any particular brand of newsagency either.

Decoupling is five jobs, done in order, over about two years. I watch newsXpress members do this work, so what follows is drawn from real shops.

Job one: find the number that is not yours. Go through your last full year and add up the gross profit from lines where somebody else sets the commission and can change the terms without asking you. Papers, magazines, lotteries, parcels, bill payments. That total, as a share of your whole GP, is your exposure. For a traditional newsagency it usually sits between half and three quarters, which shocks most owners the first time they see it. The goal is below a third. One afternoon with your POS data gets you the number.

Job two: make the floor tell the truth. Your floor is a budget. For each zone, note the share of space it takes and the gross profit it produces, divide one by the other, and sort. Most shops find a quarter of the floor producing five per cent of the profit. Quit the dead categories through a proper clearance, bank the cash, and give the space to what earns: cards, gifts, celebration. Put the papers at the back. I mean that literally. The paper customer will walk for them, and on the way they pass everything you actually make money on. Rerun the table quarterly. Move one bay each quarter.

Job three: replace the traffic before it leaves. This is the hard one, and I think it is where most transformations stall. I know of a shop with a terrific mix, gifts leading, print under ten per cent of GP, whose customer count still fell seven per cent last year. Changing what you sell does not by itself change why people come. Agency lines rented us traffic for a hundred years. Now you create it yourself. A loyalty program with real names and birthdays in it. A window that changes monthly, without fail. Small events. Local product, because the honey from ten minutes away brings in people Hallmark never will. Social media about what you unpacked this week. None of it is glamorous. All of it is weekly.

Job four: change the word. Only now do you change the sign. A rebrand on top of an unchanged shop is wallpaper. New trading name, new signage, and update your Google listing category from newsagency to gift shop, because that one field decides what searches you appear in. Check your lease first, since permitted use clauses can trip you up. Tell the story as growth: we have outgrown the old name. And do it while you are trading well. The worst time to rebrand is when you finally have to.

Job five: decouple the owner. A shop that runs out of your head is coupled to one more thing that will eventually leave. You. Document the routines. Give staff real departments with real numbers. Review the figures monthly like a board would. Nobody is queuing to buy a newsagency, but a profitable gift destination with owned traffic and clean numbers is a business a buyer can imagine owning. Decoupling and exit value are the same project.

Four numbers on the back room wall, checked monthly: customer transactions, the share of GP you control versus the share others control, GP per square metre, and the basket. If transactions and your owned share of GP are rising together, it is working.

You are done on the day no boardroom decision made without you can materially hurt your business. That is the whole test.

It starts with one afternoon and your own sales data.

Let me know if I can help: mark@newsxpress.com.au.

6 likes
Newsagency management

30 More Newsagents Are Decoupling From the Channel. Here Is What That Looks Like

Another 30 newsagents are actively working to decouple from the newsagency channel right now.

They are changing their business names, adjusting their product mix, deliberately relying less on legacy products for the future of their businesses.

This is not talk. It is work underway, in shops, right now.

For transparency: these are all newsXpress businesses, and plenty attended our recent conference in Perth, which focussed on decoupling. I am a Director of newsXpress, so read this post with that in mind.

The numbers are the numbers though, and I think they matter to anyone in this channel.

Thirty businesses moving at once is significant. In my experience, change in this channel usually happens one hesitant shop at a time. What we are seeing now is different. It is a group of retailers who have looked at the same evidence, reached the same conclusion, and started the same journey within weeks of each other.

The evidence is what I laid out in Perth. The data points to the traditional newsagency channel having less than ten years left. Papers, magazines and the other legacy lines that once defined these shops are in structural decline. That is not pessimism. It is arithmetic. And pretending otherwise helps nobody.

Decoupling is the response. Personally, I think it is essential.

It means separating the future of your business from the future of the channel. Becoming the best card and gift destination in your area, or the best of whatever you choose, rather than the local newsagency that also sells some gifts. And, what you choose can be anything, since you are not constrained by shingle expectations.

For the 30 businesses on this path, the work is practical. A new name that says what the shop is becoming, not what it was. Floor space rebalanced toward products that earn their keep. New traffic created through categories and marketing the shop controls, rather than traffic inherited from products in decline. It is roughly a two year job, done properly.

What encourages me most is the mindset. These retailers are not waiting for the channel to be saved. They are not waiting for a supplier, a distributor or a government to fix things. They are backing themselves.

I think we will look back on this period as the moment the smart end of the channel stopped identifying as newsagents and started building what comes next.

If you own a newsagency and this resonates, the first step costs nothing. Look at your sales data. Work out how much of your gross profit is controlled by others. Then decide whose future you want your business tied to. Theirs, or yours.

Footnote: The reality is that it is likely there are more than 30 newsagency businesses decoupling right now. The thirty I mention here are the ones I know about.

7 likes
newsagency of the future

We are not alone: The pharmacist and the servo: what other channels can teach newsagents

Newsagents sometimes talk as though we are the only channel being squeezed.

We are not.

Across Australia, plenty of legacy retail models have been through the same wringer: margins compressed, policy changed, customers drifted. Some of those channels have already worked out what to do about it. Here are a three examples:

The pharmacist

Community pharmacy copped it from two directions at once. The 60-day dispensing change cut dispensary margins, and Chemist Warehouse took the front of shop, the commodity toiletries, on price.

The independents that are thriving did not win that fight. They became clinical wellness hubs: vaccinations, prescribing, health screenings, boutique skincare. They swapped low-margin commodity turnover for high-margin expertise. The dispensary still matters, but it is no longer the business.

The servo

Petrol and convenience could see its own decline coming: EV adoption on the horizon, tobacco falling year after year. The response was not to defend fuel. It was to make fuel the second reason you pull in.

Walk into a good forecourt store now and it is a food and beverage business. Barista coffee, quick-service food partnerships, fresh meals. The bowsers bring some of the traffic; the kitchen makes the money.

Also, plenty of fuel outlets are now EV charging stations. Some even offer meting rooms for people to work, and meet, when charging.

The big discount store

Kmart was a struggling mid-tier department store carrying other people’s brands. It threw the model out and went with its own vertically integrated label, and became the value benchmark in the country. The specialty retailers that survived alongside it went the opposite way: out of mass-market plastics and into curated hobbies, board games and pop culture collectables.

Two opposite pivots, one shared insight: nobody survived by standing still in the middle.

What these examples have in common

In every case the squeeze was real and permanent. In every case the survivors stopped defending the legacy product and rebuilt around something customers could not get from a screen, a supermarket aisle or a big-box shed. Expertise. Food. Services. Curation.

And in every case, the businesses that waited for the legacy trade to recover are the ones we no longer talk about.

Commodity retail is a race to the bottom,.

Our channel is not uniquely cursed and it is not uniquely doomed. It is going through what others have already been through, and their playbook is sitting in plain sight: stop defending the declining product, reshape the floor around what a screen cannot replace.

What that looks like specifically for newsagents is what I will be talking about at the newsXpress conference in detail tomorrow.

3 likes
newsagency of the future

Selling your lottery business and keeping your shop might be a smart move

More newsagents outside of Western Australia are selling their lottery business. Not because they’re struggling — because they’re thinking ahead. I am seeing this move more and I guess others are too.

Some do it while winding down. The lottery licence has value, selling it separately makes the exit numbers work better than a whole-of-business sale. That’s been happening for years.

What’s newer is the transformation sale. Retailers actively rebuilding what their shop is and who it serves are looking at their lottery setup and seeing floor space, staff time, and capital locked into a product they no longer control.

The Lottery Corporation’s direction isn’t hard to read. Digital. Direct. Their money is going into moving lottery players onto their own platform. Every campaign pushing customers to the app reduces the long-term value of a retail licence. Newsagents paying attention are moving before the market moves for them.

Selling in that context isn’t giving up ground. It’s freeing it up.

The footprint a lottery terminal takes matters when you’re rebuilding a shop around gifts, collectibles, or homewares. That space earns more doing something else. The capital from the sale funds the change. The staff hours no longer absorbed by lottery transactions go somewhere that actually builds the business.

Buyers are around. Supermarkets adding a service draw. Chemists expanding their convenience offer. Standalone operators shifting the whole thing to a kiosk. For those buyers the licence fits traffic they already have. For the newsagent selling, it’s a clean separation.

This isn’t the right move for every retailer. If lottery is still generating foot traffic that converts into other purchases, the calculation is different. But look honestly at what lottery customers buy beyond their ticket. In a lot of shops the answer is not much.

The Aussie newsagency channel is mid-transition – well, for most retailers at least.

The retailers shaping what comes next are making deliberate decisions about what stays in the business and what doesn’t. Lottery deserves that same deliberate look — not held onto by habit just because it’s always been there.

I haven’t had lotteries in my newsagency businesses for 14 years now. It’s not necessary for success. What I love about not having it, having had it for years, is to not have to deal with what I personally found to be a bullying partner who thought they knew about newsagency retail, when they didn’t.

8 likes
Lotteries