Has the ANF misunderstood the MPA magazine supply trial?
Yesterday, the ANF sent an email to newsagents lauding the MPA magazine supply trial which many here consider to not be in our interests. The email from the ANF includes this:
Some newsagents appear to have a single focus on the right to early return. If you are able to manage your supply and are able to work with the distributor to order what you need, then the need to early return would be negated.
However, the reality is when an agent has been given the opportunity to set supply, on average less than 10% of the channel actually put in any figures to set their own supply.
The rules for the trial do not give newsagents the ability to manage supply.
Newsagents cannot say no to a new title.
Newsagents cannot directly set supply.
Under the terms of the trial, supply for a new title is set based on similar title performance and print run size – both key criteria in the current model.
Either the folks at the ANF have not understood the trial rules or they are out of touch with the control newsagents need. The ANF claim that newsagents will be able to manage supply is ignorant and unfortunate.
Go to page 12 of this document from the ACCC to see the rules for yourself. If I am missing something please let me know.
On the claim of less than 10% of newsagents engaging when given the opportunity to set supply, the ANF demonstrates poor judgement in saying this. Sure, I believe the less than 10% figure is accurate. However, you have to think about the level of control newsagents think they have and they trust they have in the current system when assessing the number who engage. I suspect most don’t trust enough to bother.
Change the system to something which is genuinely fair and I am sure more newsagents would engage. If the ANF actually represented newsagents they would have chosen their words to reflect this representation.










