The scare campaign by newsagent associations has damaged the image of the newsagency channel
Newsagent associations in Australia are not helping their newsagents with their talking down of the channel by claiming damage will be done if this or that protection is not offered.
For much of the last year they have run a negative campaign about lotteries on the east Coast and the issue of whether tatts places products into supermarket owned businesses.
NANA, the NSW Association lead and the ANF nationally supported the claim newsagencies would close. This is what is feeding into media attention on any matter affecting our channel right now.
This week it was the closure of Taylor Square newsagency that brought out journalists asking if this was a tipping point. Last week journalists were asking if the closure of Zoo magazine was a tipping point. I am gad I was approached so I could provide my opinions on both news items.
While the campaigns by the associations have raised awareness of the newsagency channel, the awareness is about imminent demise if this or that does not happen. Embedded in the claims by the associations is that newsagency businesses are on the edge, close to collapse if one more thing does not go their way.
The image of our businesses as fragile is an image created and promoted by the newsagency associations.
Shame on them for talking us down and for using the claim of fragility to support regulatory protection. This is not leadership – it a declaration of defeat. Plain dumb. And now, in the press and on social media this week, we are seeing the success of the association campaigns, we are seeing that people get that the channel is fragile and will collapse if one more thing does not go our way.
The newsagency channel is not fragile. Newsagency businesses are not fragile. Okay, some are. But these businesses are not the channel.
There are many strong and growing newsagencies. Newsagencies succeeding at attracting new shoppers and selling more to existing shoppers. Some are doing it without lottery products. Others have moved away fro legacy products into appealing ne product categories. Others finely balance between the traditional and the not so traditional.
Rather than talk about these successes, we again see this week calls for protection and the threat of closure.
What an utter failure of leadership and a waste of millions of dollars of newsagent funds in supporting these industry associations.
I urge newsagents enjoying good times to talk about them: to the local paper, on facebook, on Twitter. Talk about growth, a bright future and your relevance in your local area. Talk up your business and the channel. You don’t have to share the secrets of your success – but certainly share the good news of your success.
Bad news sells. This is why the shrill campaigns of the associations plays so well with the media. Those of us who are optimistic about the future of the newsagency channel need to talk about this to counter the work of those being paid to represent newsagents. We need to pitch our good news for the truth it is and for the future of the channel in the Australian psyche.
Unfortunately, newsagents are allowing the associations to get away with poor leadership. Some agree because they want protection from regulation while others shrug their shoulders and do not want to have to become involved to fix it. Me, I refuse to support it and have not been an association member for years.













