Gross oversupply of Friendship Book 2012
Gordon and Gotch yesterday supplied 12 copies of the The Friendship Book 2012 edition to one of my newsagencies. We have not had the title since we opened in 2009. In my view, there is no justification for them sending the title.
We were supposed to be on a list to not receive new stock unless requested or approved. This newsagency does not have flat-stack space, meaning that displaying the book in the appropriate place is challenging.
The only reason I can think of Gotch sending us this stock is that they had spare stock and wanted money from getting this out to stores, for the distribution fee. They will say this is not the case. Until I see proof of this I am a doubter.
We will give the title until the start of the last week of November. We’ll make space somewhere. If there are no sales and no discernable interest in the title, we will early return it to avoid the cash-flow hit.
It is activity like this, unexpected and unwarranted supply, which causes newsagents to act, sometimes early returning other titles without justification. Magazine publishers need to understand this – the behaviour of a distributor in their handling of one title can cause newsagents to strike out against another title.
What should have happened here? Here is my suggestion:
- Gotch should have emailed me saying that I am down to receive this new title, advising the quantity. The email should have three links: approved, no thanks and adjust supply quantity.
- I would have adjusted the supply quantity to 3 copies.
- I would then have asked Gotch for extra stock if sales warranted this.
By forcing the stock on me Gotch gets me offside and has me more likely to strike out against such (in my view) gross over supply. This only gives them another excuse to tell publishers and others that we are not good retailers.















