Newsagents beat supermarkets for magazines
Magazine publishers only need to look at how newsagents have supported the royal engagement issues over the last few days to see the value of the newsagency channel compared to supermarkets, petrol, convenience and others. Newsagencies have promoted OK!, Who and the early edition of Woman’s Day with clever placement in-store, good displays and training of employees. I have visited Coles and Woolworths supermarkets on the weekend and they have done nothing. I asked at a Coles whether they had the special issue of Woman’s Day and could not get past a shrug of the shoulders.
So why is it that magazine publishers give supermarkets more favourable terms than newsagents? We work harder for them, we support initiatives like the royal engagement issues yet we are treated as the poor cousins to the supermarkets.
A smart magazine publisher would go back to basics in their relationship with newsagents, realise that we are the magazine specialists, respect the attention and support we bring to the table and pull back from their supermarket and other relationships.
Yes, we make money from the sales. That is the argument put by publishers when I discuss this with them. However, we are penalised with more time consuming returns and range management work than supermarkets. We are also burdened with products which fail and this dilutes the value of the top sellers to our businesses.
The photo shows the smart work from the team at one of my stores. They re-purposed this small footprint stand to enable us to get the engagement issues on display and facing into the mall. It worked a treat! No supermarket would be smart or interested enough to do this.
I wish that magazine publishers would show newsagents respect for the extraordinary work we do.

