The dispute between magazine publishers and wholesalers in the US is hotting up. Billboard.com has a good summary of the story as it stands today including these two paragraphs:
Source argues in the letter that while the magazine publishers characterize the brouhaha as a dispute over seven cents, the whole situation is actually a part of bigger picture negotiations to “secure necessary financial adjustments to outdated distribution agreements.”
According to a story on businesstn.com, retailers like Wal-Mart are increasingly turning to scanned-based-trading (SBT), which means they pay for magazines when the products are scanned at the check out counter, rather than purchasing them in bulk from wholesalers like Anderson and Source Interlink on the front-end. This new business model impacts cashflow and squeezes liquidity for wholesalers and inflates inventory on their balance sheet.
I have called for scanned based trading (SBT) on this blog for Australian newsagents for years. See my Nov. 21, 2005 post. It is the fairest way for our resources to be used to sell and distribute magazines. The technology exists. It it were used, newsagents would be more motivated than ever before to transact their business is a compliane way. Magazine distributors will not implement SBT here because the could no longer use newsagents to financially prop up their distribution model inefficiencies.
Until newsagents take firm action the opportunity and benefits of SBT will remain locked away and in the banks for magazine distributors.
Mediaweek also covers the mess in the US including speculation that two magazine wholesalers were set to close and therefore put the distribution of many magazines at risk.