Mid last year I was approached by XchangeIT about their consideration of changes to IT infrastructure to facilitate the elimination of labelling magazines.
I explained to XchangeIT at the time:
- Smart newsagents did not label weeklies or high volume monthlies.
- Labels provided a vital role in shop floor management of magazine inventory.
- Labels provide for operational consistency – barcodes placed by publishers are not placed in consistent locations.
- The alternative was time expensive.
The XchangeIT representative put to me that newsagency software companies, like my own, profited from selling labels. I explained that while we do sell labels at Tower Systems, the margin is slim and the overall contribution to revenue less than 1% of annual sales. So, no, my thoughts are not commercially related.
If XchangeIT is concerned about newsagent productivity it should invest its time and money in ensuring fair and equitable supply of magazines. The largest overhead on a newsagency today is the labour, paper and retail space waste of oversupplied magazines. With an overall average sell through rate of around 50%, the cost to newsagents of too much stock and too many titles is clear. It is frustrating that XchangeIT remains party to management of newsagent supply in such a way that disadvantaged our channel.
This sticky label project is a distraction from the real issue at hand, the only issue at hand – to gross oversupply of magazine product to newsagents.
The XchangeIT suggestion that newsagents use additional hardware in their businesses does not make sense – it is something else to learn, that can break and that has a cost.
I see the sticky label project as a possible barrier to early returns as there is this suggested extra technology involved. The current approach is easy, lower cost, fail-safe and easy of immediate action on the shop floor.
XchangeIT is owned by the magazine distributors. Not sure about today but the ANF was also a shareholder in one XchangeIT business some years ago.