The Australian Women’s Weekly, the grand old lady of magazine publishing, could be in trouble if sales data I am seeing is accurate. Despite considerable investment in re-jigging the title by ACP Magazines over the last two years, the title is challenged. While sales remain considerable, they are falling in the newsagency channel. This may not be the case in other channels but I suspect not.

Look at the last year or so: a design revamp, more tweaking, three price points. These changes are unsettling to the traditional AWW buyer. Add to that the new and refreshed titles encroaching on this space: Better Homes and Gardens, Notebook, Real Living, Madison … there are many new titles playing to the same or a similar demographic. Also, habits have changed. We consume in shorter chunks now and AWW is more designed for a longer read.

Talk to executives from competitor publishers and they will tell you they are concerned. The last thing any magazine publisher in Australia wants to see is an iconic title like AWW in trouble. Trouble for AWW will reflect as trouble for the whole category.

If my information is right and AWW retail sales are falling, it will be interesting to see how the new management team in control of ACP Magazines handle this.

As a retail newsagent I need AWW to be strong. It is an anchor title in the most important part of my newsagency. I build other sales around its on sale period each month. But now I have to look for other honey pot titles to drive add on sales – titles off which I can grow weaker titles.

I first noticed that AWW was in trouble in my store a year ago when it was the most redeemed magazine title under our magazine loyalty program. It was the title our customers took as their freebie. To me, someone who failed economics and statistics, this suggested that AWW was a discretionary purchase with many no longer wanting to spend the money.

To try and kick sales we have run over the counter promotions and introduced road block display strategies based around AWW. Each has worked well, adding sales of 25 and more copies on the day – mid through the on sale period for an issue. However, one cannot do this every month.

I have no easy solution for AWW. Rather, I just want to record that AWW is unwell and we – newsagents, ACP Magazines and, indeed, all in the magazine channel – need this situation turned around.

To write this is heresy but someone has to open the issue for discussion.

For the last two years we have run a co-location strategy with weekly magazines – placing them in a second location for the first two days of their on sale period. Ben Kay, manager of my newsagency feels that Take 5 and That’s Life will be as successful without this additional front of house support. I disagreed initially but now I reckon that Ben may be onto something for these titles. So, we are leaving Take 5 and That’s Life in the body of the shop. We’ll measure their sales and the sales of titles near them. The risk with co-location is that you may get fewer add on sales since the customer does not enter deep into the store. I’ll report back how this goes.

Our Delicious sales fluctuate but not enough to have our supplies slashed. This month we are down 50% on last month and with such a small quantity we cannot feature the magazine or co-locate. A reasonable assessment of sales over the last four issues would not have resulted in this cut – it makes me wonder if someone has overridden the NDD scale out systems or whether their systems have a problem. I am sure the folks at Delicious would be concerned to hear about supplies being cut as we have experienced. It could be that I am not alone in the cut this month.

Zoo Weekly was announced as magazine of the Year and Magazine of the Launch of the Year last night as voted by newsagents.

Zoo is proving to be a good add on sale – to newspaper purchases especially. Basket efficiency is helped in our case by a great stand the folks at Zoo organised for us – this has been placed next to our newspapers. I think the key is to get Zoo away from Picture, People and similar publications as they seem to be browsed by different consumers.

One question doing the rounds of the ANF newsagent’s conference on the Gold Coast yesterday was about the future ownership of NDD magazine distributors. Some seem to think there will be a change of ownership in a matter of weeks. Others are more wishing for change given the performance of many of the NDD titles – data from my newsagency and many others I have seen show NDD delivering the worst overall sell through rate for newsagents.

Newsagents place extraordinary faith in magazine distributors. Poor scale out decisions can cost the small business channel millions. This is why there would be strong interest among newsagents if NDD were to change hands for such may represent an opportunity to drive a more commercially viable relationship.

NDD was the centre of much discussion among newsagents attending the conference – many lamenting the cost to their business of the preparedness of NDD to supply through the channel titles which are not commercially viable on current terms at retail.

If interest in the in store display for this month’s Ralph magazine is anything to go off, the launch of Ralph TV should be a hit. Our display is drawing plenty of attention. I appreciate that some customers will take offence. I have to balance that with the knowledge that competitors such as supermarkets, petrol and convenience outlets are not likely to display this material and sales are therefore likely to be strong.

I am sure there will be guys asking us to keep the posters for them once we take the display down.

Emporium magazine, the vanity magazine from Myer and being sold through newsagents as a secondary channel appears to be a dud if the sales data I have seen is anything to go by. I am seeing sell through rates of 10% and less so far.

New titles are expensive for newsagents. We carry them on the shelves for, often, two months, only to find sales not as good as hoped – meaning we wait another month or two to claw back the returns value. We’re our of the cash for three or more months.

This is where a magazine czar could help us by controlling the titles which have access to our network.

The Monthly is a good magazine but I can’t sell it if I don’t have the stock. The latest issue has been out two days already. Last month we received stock more than a week after publication. Newsagents need to receive stock on the day of publication so they can leverage off media interest.