Is the VANA formation of a new national ‘association’ a joke?
VANA, the association of some Victorian newsagents has announced a name change and a national focus. They have created National Lottery and Newsagents Association, NLNA. Talk about original. ALNA, the Australian Lottery and Newsagents Association already exists, with an almost identical name, and has a track record of good representation.
This is a stupid move by VANA in my opinion, a move taken to further splinter the already challenged representation of the newsagency channel. A selfish move, maybe ego driven.
The name represents the stupidity. Rather than being creative, they decided to copy. Talk about dumb.
VANA should have folded into ALNA. One national body is enough for the shrinking channel. Now, suppliers are left wondering where to support. My view is that VANA deserves no support. They are not an association. Instead, they are a marketing group trading off the back of a single state association. Good luck to them. However, they need to stop obsessing about agency business to have a future.
VANA parades as an association but I bet they take a percentage from every supplier organisation they support in one way or another. They can do that for sure, but call it what it is – a marketing group.
In my view, associations should be purely that, associations – representing members in collective bargaining and to government on policy matters. That’s not VANA.
I have no arrangement with ALNA whatsoever. I think they are doing a good job. This move by VANA against them is dumb. It splinters and already splintered channel.
Footnote: I am a director of newsXpress, a newsagency marketing group, a competition of VANA in some areas. The difference is that newsXpress is transparent as to what it is.










