A blog on issues affecting Australia's newsagents, media and small business generally. More ...

retail advice

Cost cutting could be the wrong move for your retail business

If you are keen to cut costs in your retail business, I am writing this for you.

I get it. Cutting costs makes sense. You can see the cost. You cut it. It’s gone.

If only it were that easy.

Governments do this. They come to power promising to cut costs. Then they find the cuts hit vital services, or hurt the community in some other way. Business is no different. A cut can deliver a short-term gain and long-term pain.

My advice is that you ask a different question first.

Before cutting anything, I think retailers should ask: am I using the resources I already have properly and profitably? In most instances I see, they are now.

Take the software you run your shop on. Only rarely do I see retailers use it to:

  • stop buying badly
  • cut theft
  • bring customers back sooner.

Each of these is an easy win with good software. Each puts money back in the business.

There is a false saving in cutting costs.

I have seen retailers switch to cheap, generic software to save $100 a month. On paper, it looks smart. In practice, that software often can’t help with buying, theft or getting customers back through the door.

Meanwhile, the retailer who uses their software properly could make $500, $1,000 or more a month from smarter decisions. That’s not a saving. That’s new money.

Some retailers, of course, don’t care. They want the $100 saving because doing some work to make much more money diesel;t interest them. These people should not own a business.

Now: the low-hanging fruit trap.

When cash is tight, it’s tempting to grab the low-hanging fruit. Cancel a subscription. Drop a service. Move on.

Too many retailers do this and miss the bigger opportunity. The money is usually in using what you already have, better.

Three things I suggest you try if costs are a concern for you.

  • Run a slow-seller report. Stop reordering lines that haven’t sold in 90 days. Quit dead stock.
  • Check refunds, voids and stock adjustments for patterns by staff member and time of day.
  • Look at your loyalty data. Find the regulars who haven’t visited in a month and invite them back.

If your software can’t do these things, that’s the cost conversation worth having. Not the $100.

Disclosure: I founded Tower Systems, which makes retail software for newsagents and other independent retailers.

3 likes
Newsagency management

Your sales data has answers. Are you asking the questions?

Most newsagencies are sitting on years of sales history that’s not used.

Picture two newsagencies in neighbouring suburbs. Similar size, similar mix, similar rent.

In the first, the owner spends a slow afternoon behind the counter, then reorders whatever sold last month.

In the second, the owner exports uses AI to create orders based on what’s selling over time. They also use AI to spot trends and look for allied products. They then cull products and suppliers that aren’t performing.

The second business is growing net profit while the first one is treading water.

be like the second newsagent. Smart. Making fact based decisions. Chasing profit.

Questions worth starting with

  • Show me my top 20 and bottom 20 products by gross profit, not by sales.
  • In which weeks of the year do I regularly run short on cards?
  • Here is my roster and my hourly sales. When am I overstaffed, and when am I short?
  • Here are my recent Google reviews. What do customers praise, and what do they complain about?
  • Here is a month of my Facebook posts. Which product areas am I ignoring?
  • Then ask a follow-up. The first answer is rarely the best one. I find “Why do you think that is?” and “What would you change first?” usually get you to something you can act on.

AI gets things wrong, and it does so with complete confidence. Check any number before you act on it. Keep customer names, emails and loyalty details out of anything you upload.

It also won’t fix the floor. It might tell you the card wall underperforms on weekends, but someone still has to refresh that wall and help the customer standing in front of it. Independent stores win on their people, on the way staff greet customers and suggest products. Data can show you where to focus that effort. It can’t do the work.

I hear plenty of concerns about AI from retailers, mostly around copyright, energy use and jobs. They’re fair conversations to have.

Sitting it out is a business decision too, though, and it has a cost. The gift shop up the road isn’t sitting it out. Neither is the online seller in your collectables category, or the franchise group with an analyst at head office.

You don’t need a course or a consultant to get started. Set aside an hour this week, export one report and ask it three questions. Then write down one thing you’ll change.

Next week, try a different report.

A small shop can’t outspend the big players or undercut them on price. It can know its own business better than they do. An hour a week with your sales data is a cheap way to start.

3 likes
AI

Games and Puzzles Are Up 38%: The Toy Opportunity Newsagents Should Grab Now

Australian toy sales grew 10% in August 2026 and are up 12% for the year to date. Games and puzzles were the biggest dollar gainer this year, up 38%. Trading cards and jigsaws suit newsagency space, price points and shoppers. I think now is the time to give them more room.

The latest Australian toy sales data, collected for the Australian Toy Association, is good news for August 2026. Toy sales grew 10% for the month and are up 12% for the year to date. Globally, growth is stronger again at 16%.

I’ve been saying for a while that toys, games and puzzles deserve more space in newsagencies. These numbers back that up.

The biggest dollar gainers for the year to date were:

  • Games and puzzles, up 38%
  • Building sets, up 16%
  • Explorative and other toys, up 55%
  • Action figures and accessories, up 11%
  • Vehicles, up 8%

This list is ranked by dollars added, not percentage growth. That’s why explorative toys sit third despite growing 55%.

The top properties in August were Pokémon, Hot Wheels, Marvel Universe, Star Wars and Magic: The Gathering. Licensed toys now account for 47% of all toy dollars.

The fastest-growing properties compared with August 2025 tell an even clearer story: LEGO Pokémon, KPop Demon Hunters, Pokémon, Magic: The Gathering and The Hobbit.

Look at that the good news in the second list. Pokémon, Magic: The Gathering, The Hobbit. Strategic trading card games grew 24%, driven by Magic: The Gathering, The Hobbit and Riftbound. Cards are a big part of the games and puzzles story.

Many newsagents already sell Pokémon cards. Plenty sell jigsaws and puzzle books. We have the counter, the foot traffic and the customers.

What I think many of us lack is commitment. Cards get a small spot by the register. Jigsaws sit on a bottom shelf, spine out. That’s not good enough for a category growing at 38%.

The average toy price in August was $19.19, down slightly from $19.47 a year earlier. That’s a newsagency price point. It’s a gift, a reward or an impulse purchase, not a trip to a big-box toy store.

Christmas is about 12 weeks away. Here’s where I’d start.

  • Take space from magazines. Magazine sales are in structural decline. Every metre you free up can work harder for games, puzzles and cards.
  • Make a new category: puzzles, games, trading cardstrading cards a destination, you choose. Invest space and capital.
  • Back the licences. With 47% of toy dollars going to licensed product, stock the properties kids and adults are asking for.

Toys are growing, and games and puzzles are leading the way. For newsagents looking to replace declining categories, I think this is one of the clearest opportunities we’ve had in years.

The shops that commit space now will do well this Christmas. The ones that leave cards by the register and jigsaws on the bottom shelf will watch the sales go elsewhere.

Source: Data collected for the Australian Toy Association, August 2026.

5 likes
Newsagency management

The first newsagent ChatBot is now even smarter

A little over a month ago, newsXpress quietly launched the second generation of AI ChatBot made for newsagents. The first generation was launched many months ago.

This ChatBot is unique and completely self serve. In creating it I have leveraged years of experience in the software space and years owning newsagency businesses and being involved with newsXpress.

In the weeks since launch of the second generation, the knowledge of the ChatBot has radically expanded.  It covers more topics and goes deeper on previously known topics.

How it works

The ChatBot uses closed-loop AI. It answers only from what it has been trained on, so it’s designed not to guess.

You ask a question the way you’d ask a person. You don’t need to learn any special commands.

Here’s some of what it has been trained on:

  • Wage rates under the current Retail Industry Award
  • Classifying employees based on the work they do
  • Managing a difficult employee
  • Dismissing someone within the law
  • Steps to take if you suspect theft
  • Insurance policies to consider
  • Checking your EFTPOS rate
  • Negotiating with your landlord
  • Managing cashflow
  • Selling your newsagency
  • Improving your business
  • How your business compares to others
  • New products and which suppliers stock them
  • Where to find mental health support

It covers a lot more than this. You can also upload a report and ask it what it sees.

How we built it

The work started years ago, when we built a searchable knowledge base for newsXpress members.

In 2025 we expanded that knowledge base and reviewed and updated every article. This year we reviewed every article again, sorted them into categories and wrote new ones.

We then connected it to Fair Work, the Retail Industry Award and other public resources, so pay and employment answers come from the right source.

It’s our own knowledge base though where the real value-add lives.

Before launch, we asked it hundreds of questions and checked each answer for accuracy and usefulness.

What I like about it

Most of what newsagents ask are questions they’d otherwise ring about, or not even ask at all. Now they can get an answer after close, on a weekend, or whenever the question comes up.

I also like that it sticks to the source material. When you ring someone, you get their experience along with their opinions. For questions about staff, money or selling the business, a straight answer from the right source is often what you need.

Using it also builds confidence with AI tools, which helps elsewhere in the business.

I think this is where small business support is heading. It lets us help more members at a lower cost.

If you’re a newsXpress member, try it with a question you’ve been meaning to ring about.

…

Oh, and newsXpress is now known as Stride Retail Pty Ltd.

6 likes
AI tools

The ATO’s credit card decision hurts small business cash flow

The ATO will stop taking credit card payments after 30 November 2026 and I reckon it’s a dumb move. At the very least, the timing for such a m Ove is off.


For small businesses that sometimes use a credit card to pay tax when cash is tight, that is one less option.

Debit cards will still be accepted. That changes how you pay, not what you pay from. A debit card uses money already in the account. A credit card buys you time.

Think about a newsagency in the lead-up to Christmas. Stock has to be bought in October and November. Rent, wages, supplier accounts and tax can all fall due before the Christmas sales arrive. For some retailers, a credit card has covered that gap for a few weeks.

I am not arguing that credit cards fix an underfunded business. They don’t. They cost money. Anyone using one to pay tax needs to know the fees and have a realistic plan to clear the balance.

But many retailers who pay the ATO by card are not in trouble. Their problem is timing. Taking the card away does not bring Christmas sales forward. It does not push the rent back either.

The ATO says the decision follows the RBA’s review of surcharging. It says the community should not carry credit card merchant fees. I accept there is a public cost. I would like to see the same weight given to the cost for businesses that relied on this option.

If you have a payment plan linked to a credit card, act now. Change the payment method before your first instalment due after 30 November. If you don’t, payments may fail and the plan could fall into arrears or default Review your cash-flow forecast for the months ahead and talk to your accountant.

The ATO should reconsider. At the very least, it should offer a practical transition that deals with the funding gap. The tax still has to be paid. Retailers have just lost one of the ways to pay it on time.

Let’s look at 2026 so far: award wages up 5%, rent up 5%, payments surcharge removed at a cost to business of 1%, utilities up 5% and more, insurance up by around 10%. It’s challenging. For some, being able to pay tax by card meant they had more time to manage their cash position.

8 likes
Newsagency management

Australia’s biggest news voice paid no tax here, again

News Corp is the largest commercial news organisation in Australia. Its mastheads include news.com.au, the Herald Sun, The Daily Telegraph, The Australian and The Courier-Mail. Industry audience data shows that News Corp Australia held the number one news publisher position for every month of 2025, according to Ipsos iris rankings. In a recent month, its network reached 16.6 million Australian adults, or 78.1% of those aged 18 and over. adnewsmediaweek

That reach brings enormous power. News Corp does more than report the news. It decides what makes the front page, which issues dominate the week and how they are framed. All too often, it goes further and tells us what to think.

Its mastheads are rarely short of advice for us – dvice about our values, how the country should be run and about who is doing the right thing.

So it is fair to ask what News Corp contributes in return. In my opinion, the company does not make a contribution to match its voice.

Australian Taxation Office corporate tax data released this week gives the answer. In 2024-25, News Australia Holdings Pty Limited, the Australian holding company of the Murdoch family’s News Corp, reported total income of $1.89 billion and taxable income of $310 million. Its tax payable was nil.

It is the tenth year in a row the company has paid no tax here.

News Corp is a foreign company, incorporated in the United States. I am not suggesting it has broken the law. Losses carried forward and tax offsets can legally reduce a tax bill to zero. But paying nothing year after year is a choice. It is a striking choice for an organisation that spends so much time telling Australians how to behave.

GST does not change the picture. News Corp collects it, but customers pay it.

Small businesses in Australia, like newsagents, no front page to set the national agenda, and no global structure to move profits through.

Influence brings responsibility. The organisation with the loudest voice in Australian news should be willing to pay its share for the country it speaks to every day.

Until it does, readers are entitled to weigh its lectures with that in mind.

And, look, while you’re here, newsagents are treated poorly by News in my opinion, making around 12% from each newspaper sold from which we pay payments processing costs, labour, rent, product theft and all the usual business overheads.

4 likes
Social responsibility

Well done RBA and those who have cheered you on, you’ve just taxed small business lottery retailers.

It’s October 1, 2026. Surcharging to recover costs associated with how a customer chooses to pay is banned from today.

I am angry about what the ban on payment surcharges does to small business lottery retailers.

I am angrier still at the cheering. Commentators, lobbyists, media outlets and politicians of all sides have lined up to applaud the RBA for a move that hurts small business.

A real business cost is being dumped on retailers who work on a fixed, tiny margin, and we are expected to join in the applause.

From today, the major card networks’ no-surcharge rules take effect under the framework enabled by the RBA’s changes. Lottery retailers who have used surcharging to recover their payment costs lose that option. They keep the bill.

This move by the RBA is a tax on these local small retail businesses. The government does not collect it. A policy decision imposes it, and it comes straight out of the money they use to pay their bills and themselves.

A 1% fee can take 10% of the margin

Take a retailer who processes $100 in lottery sales by card and earns $10 in commission. A $1 payment processing fee takes 10% of that commission.

A commentator sees a 1% fee. The retailer sees a tenth of their income on those sales disappear, before wages, rent, electricity, insurance and everything else it takes to keep the doors open.

The real figures vary. Commission rates differ, payment fees differ, and so does the mix of cash and card. But this is how a fee that looks small from the outside can eat around a tenth of the gross margin on the lottery sales concerned.

If you think that is trivial, try taking the same cut to your own income. Then tell a small business owner to stop complaining.

“Put your prices up” is a useless answer

The ACCC says businesses can recover payment costs through their overall pricing. What use is that to a retailer who does not set the price?

Lottery ticket prices are fixed. Changing them requires approval from state regulators or governments, as The Lottery Corporation pointed out in its submission to the RBA. A retailer cannot adjust the price because the merchant bill has landed on them alone.

Charging more for something else in the shop? I do not accept that either. Why should the customer buying a greeting card pay for someone else’s lottery transaction?

Yes, the RBA’s package lowers the interchange fee caps. Good. A lower cost is still a cost, though, and whatever is left has to come from somewhere.

The cheer squad

It frustrates me how readily the small business owner’s income is treated as the easy answer. Let them absorb it. Let them work out how to make ends meet. Just do not let them spoil the good-news story.

The commentators, lobbyists, media outlets and politicians cheering this on have had their moment. They got the headline about savings at the counter. Not one of them has to find the money.

So own the consequence. You cannot celebrate the saving for the customer and ignore the retailer paying for it. If you backed this, you backed the cost that comes with it.

To the RBA and the ACCC: a lottery retailer on a fixed margin deserves a better answer than advice to recover costs through prices they are not allowed to set. These are real businesses. They are more than an awkward footnote to a tidy policy announcement.

You can all sleep well tonight. For the retailers facing the arithmetic above, the result is effectively a tax of around 10% of their gross margin on card-paid lottery sales. They can stay up working out how to cover it.

Well done, all. What a way to back small business.

A note to the politicians: when the next election rolls around and you say small business is the backbone of our economy, your laziness on this surcharge ban will show what you really think – that you don’t care about small business.

12 likes
Social responsibility

Card surcharging ends tomorrow

The EFTPOS pitches keep coming, so here is my warning, again.

Getting ready for the new rules and choosing a payment provider are separate decisions. Do not rush either.

What changes tomorrow

From 1 October 2026, surcharging is generally prohibited on eftpos, Mastercard and Visa debit, prepaid and credit cards, unless an exemption applies. American Express is also removing surcharging. Your card costs remain, so cover them in your pricing.

Interchange caps fall to 8 cents or 0.16% for debit and prepaid, and 0.3% for consumer credit. These cap interchange, not your total merchant fee. What matters is your actual bill.

Who makes money from the pitch?

The promoter may be paid if you sign. That could be a POS company, a group earning a referral fee or a comparison service. It does not make the plan bad. It does mean the interest should be disclosed.

Four questions before you sign

  • Who gets paid, and how much? Get it in writing.
  • What will it cost from 1 October? Use your actual transactions and include every fee.
  • How do interchange cuts reach me? For cost-plus, ask what is passed through and what margin is added.
  • What happens later? Ask about introductory rates, fee changes and exit costs.

Urgency is not an answer.

My position

I have no financial interest in this. My business Stride Retail Pty Ltd (newsXpress) does not make anything whatsoever from EFTPOS recommendations or transactions.

I want retailers paying the lowest practical total cost.

What to do today

  • If you surcharge: Switch it off on terminals, POS and online checkout. Update signs and brief staff.
  • Check your margin: Adjust prices where needed.
  • Get claims in writing: Then check your October statement against what was promised.

Who makes money from the recommendation? A good deal will stand up to that question.

2 likes
Newsagency management

A good story isn’t evidence

I read a marketing post last week from the founder of a well-known Australian brand. It’s a well-told story, slick, emotive. But, little on detail.

It goes back to his first business years ago, products sold on pre-sale. About $10,000 in orders came in before the stock landed. Then the container was held at the border for inspection, and 400 customers waited for weeks while he emailed them one by one.

When the stock finally arrived, he packed 500 boxes by hand with a free candle in each. He drove them to post offices in a ute. Some turned him away.

After that, business took off. $200 on the first day. $10,000 in the second month. About $1 million in profit in the first full year.

The post finishes with an offer. If your brand turns over $30,000 a month or more, you can apply for his paid one-on-one mentoring network.

Now, here’s the evidence I’d want to see before signing up for what he’s selling.

A P&L. The $1 million profit figure is a key hook in the story/ There is no evidence it is true.

The numbers don’t fit. He says profit, not revenue. To make $1 million profit at a decent margin, you’d need several million dollars in sales. Getting there from $10,000 a month in under a year is a big jump, and the story skips over it. I’d like to hear how that happened. Evidence matters.

I’d also want to know the photo with the post shows the actual shipment. There is nothing in the photo to show it is real and about his business.

I’m not saying any of this is made up. New importers do get their goods inspected, and plenty of businesses have a rough start and come good. My point is narrower. When a story is used to sell something, the seller owes you more than the story.

I’ve seen this formula before

Courses, workshops and mentor programs are often sold using a proven narrative: a struggle, an emotional low point, a big number, then the offer.

It works. You finish reading and feel like you know the person. You don’t know their numbers though, and the numbers are what you’d be paying for.

The pitch is made to sound like getting access is hard to get. It’s the psychology of rarity, fomo, they are leveraging.

There’s no price in the post, either. You apply, and they tell you whether you’re a fit. That application is usually the start of a sales conversation. I’d rather know the cost up front.

Scale isn’t always the answer

The pitch is about scaling. I’m sceptical of that too.

I’ve watched retailers chase growth and end up with a bigger wage bill, more stock on the floor and less money in their pocket. Sales went up and profit went backwards. It happens more often than people admit.

The newsagents I see doing well right now mostly went the other way. Some audited their labour and found close to 20% of staff time going on tasks that didn’t need doing. Others put through 1% price rises on price-controlled lines, or reset the counter for impulse purchases. It’s unglamorous work, and you won’t see much of it on social media, but it shows up in the P&L.

Before you pay

The people I see making money from courses and mentoring are the ones selling them.

If you’re considering a course or paying for a mentor, ask for evidence of success. Ask to speak with two or three recent past clients who aren’t on the testimonials page.

Reading the story again, they got through the worst of it on their own, with a ute and a lot of late nights. I think that’s the most useful part of the post, and it’s free.

6 likes
Ethics

Good retail advice puts the retailer first, even when the truth is uncomfortable

Good retail advice is not always the advice you want to hear. Sometimes it means being told that the rent is unaffordable, that your negotiating position is weaker than you think, or that continuing on the same path could cost you more than making a difficult change.

This is not about being negative. It is about taking the retailer’s future seriously.

A business facing a difficult lease situation provides a useful example. The owner wants relief from an unsustainable cost, but there are also unpaid obligations to address. Discussions are going nowhere, while the pressure on the business continues.

It would be easy to say the landlord needs to be more reasonable. That might be true, but it is not enough to help the retailer decide what to do next.

Useful advice has to go further. What does the business actually earn? What can it afford? What needs to change, and what happens if the other party will not agree?

Start with the facts

Being on the retailer’s side does not mean agreeing with everything the retailer says. It means being honest about the whole position, including the parts within the retailer’s control.

If there are arrears, confirm the balance and get advice on a realistic written arrangement. If the cash flow cannot support the proposed payments, say so. A promise made to relieve pressure today is not a solution if it creates a bigger problem next month.

The same discipline applies to the trading figures. Separate sales from commissions, understand gross profit, and account for the full cost of occupying the shop. Include a proper return for the owner’s work rather than treating their time as free.

A busy shop can still be a poor business for its owner. The question is not simply whether money keeps coming through the register, but what remains after the costs of earning it.

Advice should turn that information into decisions. Set out what is affordable, put proposals in writing, seek responses by clear dates and investigate alternatives while discussions continue.

Another conversation is not necessarily progress. Know what outcome is needed and how long the business can afford to wait.

Your needs belong at the centre of the decision

The landlord has an asset to protect. Suppliers want orders, service providers want their outlets maintained, and customers want the convenience of a familiar local shop.

Those interests are understandable. They are not a reason for the retailer to accept a business that no longer meets their own needs.

Your income matters. So do your savings, your health, your family and the time you have available for a life outside the shop.

Putting those needs first does not mean ignoring debts, contracts or responsibilities to employees. It means getting appropriate advice and dealing with those obligations without assuming that you must keep sacrificing more of yourself to preserve the business unchanged.

This is also a test for anyone advising a retailer. Would the advice be the same if the best outcome meant losing a customer, a tenant or a colleague?

It should be. Advice that puts the retailer first must leave room for an outcome that does not suit the adviser.

Be prepared to make the tough decision

A better lease may provide a path forward. A smaller shop, a different location or a changed business model may also deserve serious consideration.

Each option needs proper costing. A relocation is not a plan until the costs, likely trade, necessary approvals and ongoing commitments have been checked. A rent-free period is not enough if the rent that follows remains unaffordable.

Selling may be an option. So may an orderly exit, with professional advice on the financial, legal and employee obligations involved.

These are not comfortable conversations, particularly when years of work and personal identity are tied to a shop. But the time and money already invested cannot, on their own, justify committing more.

Being prepared to leave is not about making threats in a negotiation. It is about understanding the alternatives and deciding what you will do if an acceptable agreement cannot be reached.

I want independent retailers to succeed. That means wanting a worthwhile outcome for the person behind the counter, not simply another year with the doors open.

The best advice helps a retailer see clearly, act responsibly and make a decision they can live with. Sometimes that means rebuilding the business. Sometimes it means choosing a different future.

2 likes
Newsagency management

Tony Robbins is coming to Australia: Save the four hundred to six thousand dollars. Back yourself instead.

Tony Robbins is coming to Australia Sydney next week for two days at the Fortuna One Summit. Tickets cost somewhere between four hundred and six thousand dollars. Then there are flights, accommodation, food and time costs to consider.

Don’t go. Back yourself instead.

Tony is a master presenter, no argument. He has spent decades honing his skills and knows exactly how to move an audience from ordinary Tuesday to standing on a chair by Wednesday afternoon. The volume, the pacing, the firewalk. All of it is choreographed to make you feel.

That is the point.

I think it is about making you feel you need more of him to become the version of yourself you glimpsed in the room. The two days you paid for are, structurally, an ad for the twelve months and the dollars that come next.

I say this as someone who has been to sessions like this in Australia and the US. I’ve paid thousands. But I stopped that in the late 1990s when I realised that I was enough, that my skills were what mattered and not how much I got caught up in an almost evangelical moment.

What the money could do instead

Four hundred dollars buys category signage and a proper look at your top thirty suppliers. Fifteen hundred is a weekend away with your partner talking about what you want the business to look like in three years. Three thousand gets a retail specialist walking your floor with you, plus new fixtures for the front of store. Six thousand covers a full store review, a floor replan, refreshed signage, a trial of a new range, and leaves change.

Any of those will change more in your shop than two days in an arena.

What actually changes a retail business

Transformation in a small shop is boring. It is not a firewalk. It is a fortnight cleaning up your category coding, a Sunday with the P&L and a highlighter, one honest conversation with a supplier. It is finally deleting the range that has not sold in two years.

None of that requires a guru. It requires you, a quiet room and a bit of nerve.

The room is not the answer

Twelve thousand people, most of them nodding, most of them buying at the back at the break. That environment is built to make hesitation feel like weakness. Any decision you would not make on a Tuesday morning at your desk, you should not make in a stadium on a Wednesday night.

Back yourself

You already know what needs to happen in your business. You have known it for months. What you have been waiting for is permission, or energy, or a push. A stadium gives you a jolt of all three. It fades by Monday. The invoice does not.

Keep the money. Take a day off, walk your shop like a customer, pull two years of numbers, and write down the three things you have been avoiding. Do one of them by Friday.

That is the seminar. It is free, and it is already booked.

9 likes
Newsagency management

Advice for newsagents and and small business retailer: The seven-question store health check you can run in an afternoon

Most independent retail shops do not need another report, advice from a business consultant or their accountant. They need time with the numbers already sitting in the POS and an honest look at the shop floor.

I say this based on work I have done recently with ten very different independent shops in recent weeks. It is deliberately short: seven questions you can answer in an afternoon.

Grab last financial year and the year before, a tape measure and a coffee.

1. Are transactions up or down?

Turnover can lie. Transactions rarely do.

Pull the total number of sales for the last full year and compare it with the year before. If transactions are down while sales are flat or up, you are living off a bigger basket from fewer people, and that is fragile.

A drop of three or four per cent in transactions is a signal. Five or more is a problem you need to plan around, not hope through.

Ask what changed in the catchment. Maybe an employer closed, a competitor opened, the council changed the traffic flow, or the suburb itself is different now. The plan for a shop losing visits looks nothing like the plan for one growing them.

2. Which departments actually make the profit?

Sales by department is easy to pull. Gross profit by department is the number that matters, and far fewer owners look at it.

Apply an honest margin to each department. Cards and wrap often sit near 60 to 65 per cent. Stationery, giftware and toys are usually closer to 50. Agency lines, lotteries and papers are far lower than most owners want to admit.

Do the multiplication. You will almost always find one or two departments doing quiet, heavy lifting on gross profit while sitting on modest sales. Those are the departments to defend.

3. Does floor space match where the profit comes from?

Now measure. Pace out or tape out the selling space each department occupies and convert it to a share of the total.

Put the gross profit share and the space share side by side. The gaps between those two columns are your work list. In the four shops I looked at, this comparison drove the hardest conversations and the best decisions.

A department earning twenty per cent of gross profit on eight per cent of the floor needs more room. One earning five per cent of gross profit on twenty per cent of the floor needs less. The answer is almost always reallocating the space you already have, not buying more fixtures.

4. Where is the dead or lazy space?

Walk the shop. Look for empty metres no one has claimed, fixtures the staff walk past without touching, and categories that have not moved a serious unit in months.

Dead space still costs you rent, lighting and attention. Two or three square metres reclaimed from a tired category is enough to test a serious new range without spending a cent on shopfitting.

Front-of-store real estate deserves its own look. If your highest-margin category is on the back wall and something ordinary is at the door, you have already found this afternoon’s win.

5. Is the data you are relying on actually clean?

Before you make big decisions, check the plumbing.

Look for a bucket called unknown, miscellaneous or not scanning. If it is meaningful, your department analysis is wrong by that amount. Look also for negative discounts, impossible margins, categories no one has coded in years and staff shortcuts at the counter.

Fixing category coding and scanning discipline is dull work. Do it anyway, because without it you are making next year’s decisions on feel rather than evidence.

6. What does your local catchment want that you are not selling?

Step outside the shop for a moment. Who lives here now, not ten years ago? What do people drive past you to buy somewhere else?

A shop near a school, a tourist route, a sports club or a retirement precinct has different natural ranges. Look for categories that fit your catchment and are not served well nearby: books where there is no bookshop, hobby and collectable where there is no specialist, local souvenirs where visitors have nowhere obvious to buy them, or services such as engraving and parcels where the nearest option is a drive away.

Attach any new range to demand you can already see in your own sales. A category with a small footprint that keeps selling out is telling you something.

7. Would a local identity help you more than the shingle you have today?

This question is uncomfortable for some owners and freeing for others.

If your shop has evolved well beyond papers and magazines, the word on the fascia may be limiting who walks in. A local name and a look that belongs to the town can change perception faster than any refit.

You do not have to abandon the trading name overnight. Keep the search terms working for twelve months. Test the new identity on packaging, bags, own-label products and one window before you touch the fascia.

Turning the afternoon into a plan

Seven answers on one page, and the plan almost writes itself.

Protect the departments doing the profit work and shrink or exit the ones that are not. Reallocate the space to categories that fit your catchment and your sales evidence. Clean the data so next year’s version of this exercise is sharper. Then decide whether the shop is still, honestly, a newsagency to the people you want walking in.

If you cannot get to all seven in one afternoon, do the first three. Those alone will change how you look at the shop on Monday morning.

9 likes
Newsagency management

Here are ten things every newsagent should be doing in their business, and which too many are not

This is a brutal and practical list focussed on your profit.

  1. Manage product location by GP% return. Low margin product should not be taking up more expensive real estate. Papers and magazines to the back of the shop.
  2. Review your markup approach. Charge more for items people buy from you because you are convenient – these people are not buying based on price. Stationery: 125% at least.
  3. Stop letting supplier reps place orders without your explicit approval. Know what is being spent, and when.
  4. Empty your backroom of all stock. Customers don’t shop there. Stock has no place in any back room with logistics the way they are today. None of your competitors have a loaded back room.
  5. Clean out all the shit at, under and behind the counter. And, yes, I use shit because so much at the counter is there because of habit, and not because of profit.
  6. Load three different reports from your POS software into the AI of your choice and use this prompt: what do you see? I suspect it will see things you’re not seeing.
  7. Open the shop when you will make money and not because of some misplaced notion of customer service.
  8. Buy from suppliers who will not supply newsagents.
  9. Look at your bookkeeping and accounting processes and costs. An average newsagency should spend under $5,000 a year on this and I know many spending under $3,000.
  10. Take a sheet of paper and write down the last three times you had fun in the shop. Do one of those things again. have fun.

In too many newsagency businesses things are done because they have always been done, and that’s dragging the business down, hurting it, costing it money.

You need to disrupt the business. This list seeks to do that, or at least getting you thinking of what you could come up with to disrupt the business. In disruption is innovation.

You are the best person to blow parts of your business up.

Fixing a newsagency is not high brow stuff.

You certainly don’t need a consultant, or a coach.

You need desire, followed by action.

Time is short.

7 likes
Newsagency management

Customers love products that offer a warm hug

This display of products from Affirmations and also featuring some serviettes from Henderson are getting plenty of attention from shoppers. It’s what they see as they enter. Simple. neat. Encouraging optimism. Effective.

There is nothing ground breaking about this. The display is simple for sure. My point is this product has pitched at the right time.

People are buying for themselves and for friends.

A common comment is how much they love the range. One lady told her the other day that it makes her feel good. I like that.

Decisions we make in our shops are like editorial decisions. That’s how I see this display.

2 likes
retail

If you’re chasing cost cutting in your newsagency, you may be chasing the wrong thing

Most of the conversations I have had with newsagents lately started with the same question. How do I cut costs?

Fair enough. I ask it in my own shops too. Rent is not going down and neither are wages.

But I have noticed something. Some newsagents are spending all their energy on chasing cost savings and none of it on the business.

Someone will spend an afternoon chasing lower EFTPOS fees or getting insurance quotes and feel productive. The same person has not looked at dead stock in a year, or brought on a new product category.

That is the wrong thing, I think. You can make more money today and into the future by working on your business, in your business. I know the business books don’t agree.

I think the cost saving wins because it is easy. A phone call, a form, done. Working on the business is harder. You have to look at decisions you’ve made and be honest about them based on the evidence. That is uncomfortable, and so it waits.

What I see in the numbers

Here is what I see when I go through the numbers in a newsagency, mine included.

A saving of a couple of hundred dollars a month is hard to find and disappears in one bad quarter. Meanwhile, there is stock on the shelves that has not sold since March. A section running at 25 per cent margin sits where something at 55 per cent could be. Prices on some items are lower than they could be without hurting sales. And every day people walk in, buy what they came for, and walk out without an impulse purchase.

That is where the money is. Not in a cheaper phone plan or insurance.

Where to start

My advice if you want to free up cash and make more money is to start here.

  • Run a report of everything that has not sold in six months. Mark it down and get it out within two weeks. That is cash you’ve already spent, sitting there doing nothing.
  • Rank gross profit contribution by floorspace allocation. Most who do this are shocked.
  • Reset your counter to attract impulse purchases. Surprise people, so they notice.
  • Audit where the labour you pay for is spent. Typically, 20 per cent of that time can either be freed for more valuable work or cut from the roster.
  • Look at your prices for the products over which you have price control. A 1 per cent price increase is unlikely to affect unit sales. You get to bank the 1 per cent.

None of that is exciting. It is where I have seen the biggest financial benefit, bigger than you will get chasing a cost reduction on insurance.

An offer

If you would like a second pair of eyes, I will look at your business for free and come back with specific opportunities to improve its financial performance.

I need two things from you. A monthly sales comparison report for the year to 31 August 2026 against the same period a year earlier, and a rough sketch of your shop floor layout showing each of your departments. Send them direct to mark@towersystems.com.au and I will come back to you myself.

I am not selling anything here. I want to show, with your own numbers, that working on the business is likely to make you more money than chasing a reduction in an operating expense. What you do with what I find is up to you.

…

Disclosure: I founded Tower Systems (sold it in 2024 and still work for the business today) and I own newsXpress, and I own and run newsagencies.

7 likes
Newsagency management

The first-ever AI ChatBot made for newsagents

In a first for newsagents in Australia, newsXpress quietly launched its AI ChatBot made for newsagents a few months ago.  Last week, to released a major update.

This newsagent ChatBot uses closed-loop AI technology. What that means is that it only answers what it knows, what it has been trained in. It answers questions you ask in a regular way – as if you are asking a person. Here are some of the topics it has been trained in:

  • Wage rates based on the current Retail Industry Award.
  • Retail employee classification advice based on the work they do.
  • How to deal with a difficult employee.
  • Steps to take if you think theft is an issue.
  • What insurance policy to consider.
  • Checking your EFTPOS rate.
  • How to dismiss someone within the law.
  • How to negotiate with your landlord.
  • How to deal with cashflow challenges.
  • How to go about selling your newsagency.
  • Ways to improve your business.
  • How the business is performing compared to others.
  • New products to consider.
  • Which supplier stocks this or that.
  • Where to seek mental health support.

The ChatBot covers many more topics that this. It can also read any report you provide it and give you insights as it sees them.

This is a groundbreaking resource for local small business newsagents and other retailers newsXpress serves. It’s not happened overnight. the work started years ago with the careful development of a searchable knowledge base for newsXpress members. That was the foundational basis. In 2025, the knowledge base was expanded and every existing article reviewed, and updated.

In 2026, each knowledge base article was reviewed again, categorised and new articles developed.

Next, access to FairWork, the Retail Industry Award and other publicly available resources were added, to ensure that advice provided was based on appropriate source material.

During the testing phase many questions were asked, and the answers checked for usefulness and accuracy.

This meticulous process resulted in a knowledgeable newsagents can trust, and use 24/7 to get answers to questions they would otherwise ask on the phone.

This is smart AI backed technology helping newsagents save time and learn tools that will help elsewhere in their business.

AI ChatBots like this one from newsXpress are the future. They help businesses operate efficiently and, through this efficiency, deliver quality services at a lower cost.

If you call someone for advice, you will get an answer with a natural human bias. The newsXpress ChatBot focuses on the answer, without the human bias. This can be important for the types of questions that I see newsagents asking.

…

Footnote: I am a director of newsXpress Pty Ltd.

8 likes
AI

Most newsagents are giving their best space to their worst-performing departments

This post promotes a service my business sells. Read it with that in mind, and judge it on whether the argument holds.

Here is the argument.

The typical newsagency floor was laid out for a business that no longer exists. Newspapers and magazines got the front, the window, the walk from the door to the counter, because that was what people came in for. Print bays have been shrinking for fifteen years. In most stores the space they hold has not shrunk anywhere near as fast.

Now, while you may have made some changes, most I see are not enough for a bright future.

Meanwhile cards, gifts, stationery, art and craft, collectables, plush and the newer categories are squeezed in around the edges. They earn their keep in poor positions, which is exactly why they are worth more space. A category performing from a bad spot is telling you something.

I see this constantly. Not because newsagents are careless, but because layout changes slowly. Nobody wakes up and decides to hand prime real estate to a declining category. You take out one bay, then another, then you shuffle a fixture, and five years later the shop is a compromise between what it used to be and what it is becoming.

The numbers most newsagents never see side by side

Two figures per department. The share of your selling space it occupies, and the share of your sales and gross profit it returns.

Almost nobody has these two figures next to each other. Yet the gap between them is the single most useful number in a newsagency, because it tells you where your rent is being wasted.

There is a second pattern I look for, and it is the one that worries me most.

Revenue flat, transaction count down.

I see it constantly in this channel now. Revenue holds because prices rose and because lotto and agency lines carry a dollar value. Underneath, fewer people are walking through the door. Foot traffic is the whole basis of a newsagency, and when it goes, everything built on it goes with it, usually about two years after the owner could have acted.

You cannot see this in one year of data. It shows up plainly in two.

What newsXpress is offering

A Store Opportunity Review. Send two years of sales data from your POS software and a sketch of your shop showing what is located where. That is all.

It comes back as a written report — how your two years compare on revenue, transactions, average sale, items per sale and department performance; how your space allocation stacks up against what each area actually returns; research on your local area and who is in it now; and research on the category opportunities that suit your catchment. Opportunities listed in the order I would tackle them.

Three business days. Then a follow-up consultation with the retail professional who wrote it, included.

$595 inc GST. $395 inc GST until the end of September. Prepaid to qualify you. And you know what, since I own newsXpress, if the report you receive is of no value to you whatsoever, let me know and I will refund your payment.

It is open to any local retailer, not just newsXpress members and not just newsagents. Gift shops, bookshops, jewellers and homewares stores face the same space and margin questions.

help@newsxpress.com.au.

Why I think it matters more in this channel than any other

Because newsagents are running out of runway, and space is the lever they still control.

You cannot fix print decline. You cannot negotiate lottery terms. You cannot stop a masthead closing or a distribution frequency changing. What you can do is decide what occupies the best two metres of your shop, and most newsagents are making that decision by inheritance rather than by evidence.

The stores I see doing well in 2026 are the ones that stopped waiting for the old model to stabilise and started treating themselves as retailers with a good site. The layout usually changed before the results did.

And the honest caveat

A report will not save a shop in the wrong location on the wrong lease with the wrong rent. Nothing will, and I would rather tell you that in the follow-up call than take your money and pretend otherwise.

But if the business is fundamentally sound and simply arranged for a version of itself from a decade ago, this is a cheap way to find out what to move and what to back.

Draw the sketch badly. It is the part I find most useful.

To kick this off, email help@newsxpress.com.au.

4 likes
Newsagency management

Ten years. That’s what I think this channel has left.

I’m back from our national conference in Perth. Two and a half terrific days with newsagents, newsXpress members and suppliers to the channel.

Two subjects took up most of the room. Where this channel is heading, and what AI is already doing inside shops.

Where the channel is heading

I’ll put it plainly. I think the newsagency channel, as a channel, disappears inside ten years. It gives me no pleasure to write that.


Australia sits one decision away from the closure of a capital city daily newspaper. Several of them lose money. They’re being held up partly by emotion. News Corp has always loved ink on paper. Kerry Stokes has his attachment to The West Australian. Nobody wants to be the publisher who switches the first one off. That decision is coming anyway.

Print stopped delivering news a long time ago. By the time the paper lands on the counter the story is old. Your customers already know.

Magazines tell the same story in slower motion. Deliveries went from three days a week to two, and now to one. In some places it’s a coin toss whether they turn up at all. Titles we missed used to be couriered out. Not now.

Are Media is publicly up for sale. There’s plenty of talk about a break-up, including Are Direct and possibly XchangeIT. Worth watching closely, because whoever ends up owning the distribution business owns the physical route into our shops.

Stationery keeps drifting to Officeworks. Dollarama buying The Reject Shop means a harder shove from the value end of the market.

And when we make the news, it’s a closure story. Another one bites the dust.

The answer we spent most of our time on

Most of the conference went on what to do about it. We call it decoupling.

Disconnect from being a newsagency. Stop identifying as one. Present as something completely different, ideally something local and yours, rather than another national group’s brand painted over the top of the old shop.

This is more than a cosmetic change. Once you’re not a newsagency, you can sell to people who would never have walked into one, and that’s the whole point.

Three retailers who have already done it spoke to the room. Former newsagents, all of them. They talked about de-identifying, and about how their businesses run now.

AI, live on the big screen

Nobody gave a presentation about AI. We put it on the big screen and worked on real businesses, no script, in front of the room.

One retailer is doing well with clothing and wanted to build it out. In front of everyone we looked at the mistakes being made, then at how to tell a better price and sizing story for the demographic in that town.

Another had already decided to decouple and wanted to know what else to sell. That session produced a series of opportunities needing little capital, and then a four or five page business strategy report.

We spent time on the risks too, on where AI gets things wrong. It’s useful in small business retail, but only with a human checking the work.

What I said to the suppliers in the room

This channel will lose two to three hundred newsagents this year. So think hard about what you pitch.

The smart operators want product that brings more people through the door, and a broader demographic than they have today. Product that panders to the history of the channel has no future.

If you’re not helping retailers reach further than they reach now, you’re worth less to them than the supplier who will. We’re in this together, and the ones who understand that will do well out of the next few years.

I have been called pessimistic before

A newspaper publisher once stood in front of a room and told everyone I was wrong about declining newspaper sales. Magazine publishers objected to me discussing magazine decline at all. Those calls have aged fine.

There’s no doubt in my mind that the traditional Australian newsagency has no future. A business built on lotteries, papers, magazines, stationery and greeting cards, and not much else, is already dead. The owner just doesn’t know it yet.

Now look at a shop leaning into sensory product, Pokémon and other collectibles, and good quality gifts. People walk in for completely different reasons. That business has somewhere to go.

Where we are

newsXpress has 194 members. We’ve never chased being the biggest, and we’re not your average newsagency marketing group. What we have is a group of retailers who want to move, and are moving.

Our focus is a strong back half of 2026, then 2027 and 2028.

Mark Fletcher
mark@newsxpress.com.au
0418 321 338

8 likes
newsagency of the future

A card company paying cash for card space says a lot about their business

Greeting card suppliers are back at retailer doors offering cash for wall space.

Before you sign, understand exactly what you are agreeing to.

I don’t get it, I really don’t.

What does it say about the card company that they have to give a retailer cash to buy their business. I would have thought that the retailer and the card company would make more money if the cards were the best and backed by the best service. A bag of cash takes consideration away from product. maybe that’s what they want.

The offers I am hearing of are big. Fifty thousand dollars. One hundred thousand. Sometimes three hundred thousand. The old structure was an interest free loan, repaid through rebates on card sales. More recent deals leave the rebate untouched and require the retailer to repay the cash on top.

Either way, the deal is the same. The supplier is not investing in your business. They are renting your wall. And you are the one carrying the debt.

It doesn’t make sense to me.

When choosing a card supplier you need to choose based on revenue for the business from cards, and what else happy card shoppers will buy in your business.

A card company should earn its space through sell-through. Once money enters the deal, performance stops being the measure. You stop asking which cards sell and start planning what the cash will pay for. That is exactly what the supplier wants.

The evidence is clear. We have seen a business where one supplier held the entire card wall. Splitting the wall fifty fifty delivered immediate double digit growth. A later supplier change lifted sales again. Competition and range drove those results. No cheque did.

One newsagent with multiple stores took around three hundred and fifty thousand dollars from a card company and later collapsed, leaving the supplier out of pocket. I wonder if retailers ended up paying for this?

Plenty of retailers are unhappy with their card company and cannot leave. The debt locks them in.

The cash is not free. You pay for it in weaker card sales and lost freedom to change suppliers. If a card company wants your wall, make them earn it with product that sells.

If a card company offers you cash up front for a commitment, pause. Sure, the cash would come in handy. The question has to be – over the lifetime of the contract, what is the real cost of the cash I might get today? Also ask: how bad are their products that they need to buy my business?

3 likes
Greeting Cards

Why a franchise model may not suit Australian newsagencies in 2026

The newsagency channel is in the middle of change that will not reverse. It has been for years, but in 2026 the pace of change has increased. Print is declining. Lottery purchases are shifting online. Foot traffic patterns have changed. How, when and where people shop has changed. The business model that worked in 2010 does not work now.

In my opinion, this is the wrong time to lock a business into a franchise agreement.

Let’s consider the regulatory framework of franchises first.

Franchising in Australia is regulated under the Franchising Code of Conduct, but the Code governs disclosure and dispute processes, not the day to day restrictions written into the agreement itself. Those restrictions are extensive. A franchise agreement typically binds you to approved suppliers, set trading hours, mandated fit-outs, brand standards and system-wide promotions whether or not they suit your shop.

You also inherit the behaviour of every other franchisee in the network. One store cutting corners, one public dispute, one head office misstep, and the brand you pay to trade under takes the hit in your suburb too. You carry obligations to a system you cannot control, run by people you did not choose, alongside operators you have never met. Independence has risks, but at least they are your own.

Innovation happens in stores, not head office

Franchise head offices move slower than the market. A new product category or a local marketing idea has to pass through approvals and brand reviews before anything happens in-store. Sometimes it needs a contract amendment.

An independent retailer can trial a new line this week. They can negotiate a local supply deal or move fixtures tomorrow morning. I have watched stores add a category in a fortnight that a franchise network would still be scoping six months later.

No two shops are the same

A regional newsagency and a shopping centre store need different product mixes. Franchise models tend to enforce supplier mandates and centralised ranges.

When your local market shifts, you need to move into whatever works there. Niche gifts. Collectibles. Product from a maker two suburbs away. Waiting on franchisor approval means missing the window.

You carry the risk, they keep the control

In most franchise arrangements the franchisee carries the lease, the working capital and the staffing liabilities while giving up strategic control. If you are taking all the financial risk, you should have full authority over direction, brand and where your capital goes. Especially now.

Franchise fees are inflexible when margins are not

Royalties and marketing levies are predictable overheads in stable conditions. When core categories are shrinking, they are cash drains you cannot switch off. Every dollar of mandatory fees is a dollar less buffer for volatile trading.

Independence does not mean isolation

A good marketing group gives you buying power and shared marketing without telling you what to stock. Good POS software gives you the data to make your own decisions.

Right now, autonomy is the most valuable asset a newsagent has. Signing it away to someone else’s model is a strange way to prepare for the next five years.

6 likes
Newsagency management