It is time for newsagents to be able to purchase stationery from suppliers direct
For decades newsagents have had to purchase stationery through one or the other of the newsagency stationery wholesalers.
Even when the supplier rep has been in-store, written up the order and, on occasion, supplied stock, the ‘order’ has been turned back through the wholesaler – for a premium … kind of like a tax to support the warehouse.
This order turn back has been a tax on newsagents, making their purchasing cost higher, all in the name of supporting the newsagency stationery suppliers.
What has the order turn back approach achieved? Are the stationery warehouses stronger as a result? Have newsagents themselves benefited by paying a higher price for stationery, have they received some other benefit as a result? No, I think the approach has had its day, I think it has not achieved anything and, today, it only acts as a tax.
For newsagents to be competitive in stationery, especially, with branded stationery, I think we need to be able to purchase directly without any additional cost being imposed to support a warehouse that often does not add value to the transaction.
By dealing direct in some cases we will have access to a broader range of product. This will facilitate specialisation, helping to drive sales.
Suppliers don’t need to increase their costs by increasing in-store contact with retailers. Rather, they should ensure they have a best practice website through which newsagents can order and see new products.
In my own newsagencies my focus 100% is on national brands of stationery. I want to go deep for some brands, to ensure a strong visual story in-store and online. I am better able to do this if I can go direct.
So, yes, I think it is time for stationery suppliers to offer direct accounts to newsagents, to enable those who want to specialise and go deep with a brand to do so.
Sure, there will be some newsagents who still want to go through the warehouse, and they can.
The world has changed and how we buy stationery needs to change. As I wrote recently about GNS, the model needs a shake-up for it to have a future.








