We take care in managing space allocation for the top selling magazine titles in each category. We push back against a (deliberate or unintended) land grab by a publisher which may give them an unfair advantage. If a title is packaged with free products we work hard to ensure that its competitors are allocated the same number of facings in its regular location – even though it may get extra attention in a feature display.
With more magazines including free gifts, or so it seems, managing space allocation is a challenge. If left unchecked, some titles will get more space just to accommodate the larger packaging. While this helps their sales, it hurts competitor titles and this would not aid the health of the overall magazine department.
We need to be thinking of the whole category or department in our space allocation. We need to balance space so that all key titles have a fair shot.
I’d encourage newsagents to walk through their magazine department and look at space allocation. Are there titles being given more space than competitors because of the space required to accommodate the free gifts? If so, pull the space allocation back to give all key titles in a category a fair shot. You are paying the rent after all.
The health of the magazine department in our businesses is reliant, in part, on the balance of the mix of titles. Our space allocation decisions can alter impression shoppers have of our mix. Hence the need for us to make sure that we are allocating space based on what we want to achieve and not just to accommodate gifts which are packaged with a title.