
I met with a group of newsagents in Sydney yesterday and the issue of who owns the home delivery customer came up. It’s a question newsagents have had since newspaper distribution was deregulated in 1999.
Newsagents believe that a customer they convince to take on home delivery is theirs. Publishers believe that anyone receiving home delivery of their product is theirs – regardless of how the customer was acquired.
A lawyer friend told me today that in his view, the 1999 contracts are vague on this point.
It’s an issue right now because publishers want newsagents to pass on more data about home delivery customers. They want customer name, address and the days on which the customer gets their particular newspaper. In many cases this is data about customers the publishers have never heard of before, customers won by the newsagent’s own efforts.
My lawyer friend tells me that privacy laws come into play on this issue and that newsagents need to be very careful about what information they provide to publishers. He even suggested that newsagents need to write to their customers seeking permission before passing on any home delivery customer information.
All the legal mumbo jumbo aside, where else can a business acquire customers at their cost and then be required to provide sufficient details to their supplier (for no compensation) to enable the supplier to undertake direct contact and fulfillment if they wish.