Newsagents sit on the boards of various businesses supplying newsagents including stationery wholesalers and associations. While I am sure they discharge their duties to the best of their ability, it is appropriate to consider whether newsagents are the best directors of these business enterprises.
Newsagent owned businesses, and associations conducting commercial activity to newsagents, operate in a commercial world quite different to a newsagency – distribution or retail. This is why I question why newsagents make the best directors.
Directors are usually paid fees for their time. Are they worth it ? Are their decisions adding value to the businesses? Are the boards they sit on performing well? Would they get a gig on the board of a competitor business?
I know from my own experience on the ANF board in 2003/04 that newsagents bring personal baggage to the boardroom table. I saw a lack of commercial savvy and a disinterest in due diligence and transparency. Bill Express is a perfect example of a bad decision by directors ill-equipped to make the decision. Before I resigned I expressed concern at the excess of the ANF Board meeting bar tab – a 45 minute fight ensued which I lost. They spent more time arguing about this than matters of serious commercial consequence for newsagents.
I have other stories I could share of my own and from others. If only newsagents knew.
Boards ought to be focused on big picture issues, setting direction and holding the employees of the organisations to account. Too often that is not the case, giving the competitors a free kick and wasting member and shareholder funds along the way.
These newsagent owned commercial enterprises collectively turn over well over $100 million a year.
Isn’t it time we populated the boards with quality commercial directors as competitors of these businesses do?