Stolen magazines on the streets for $2
Check out the magazines I saw available for $2 each out the front of a business branding itself as a newsagent ten days ago. Click on the image to see the detail.
These are magazines that should have been returned. My suspicion is that they are from a retailer not required to physically return stock in order to claim return credits. I am told that some major supermarkets are not required to return some magazine stock.
A staff member could process the returns and then remove (steal) the stock from the business for (illegal) on-sale rather than trashing it as would be required.
Too many publishers are represented on this table for the supply of these titles to have been arranged through them. The price of $2 is too low and they would not want their brands treated in this way. This looks like stolen property to me.
None of the magazines has a price sticker or barcode label from the retailer, not even any residue of such labels. This suggests that the stock is from a retailer who would not price or label their stock.
The only way this promotion makes sense is that the magazines are stolen as described above. The retailer offering the stock today would have to know this given that they carry full price magazines inside their shop and would therefore understand the supply chain for magazine product.
I hope that magazine distributors run spot audits of retailers permitted to claim returns without actually returning the stock. Given what I have seen recently and earlier this year I have my doubts.
Footnote – this business is not a newsagency business. It is a convenience store with the shingle newsagent above the door. The business does not have direct supply of magazines.












