Gotch email demonstrates a core problem with the magazine distribution model
Magazine distributor Gordon and Gotch yesterday emailed many newsagents reminding them that their account was due to be paid yesterday:
Dear Customer,
We take this opportunity to remind you that your Aug’10 account was due on the 20th of Sep. As has previously been communicated, continued disregard of trading terms may result in supplies being suspended.
We urge you to promptly settle the debt due at present and adhere to our terms of trade going forward, thus avoiding any disruption to trade. Attached below are our banking details for electronic transfers.
I know of several newsagents who received this email who had already paid their account. While that is disappointing, it is not what galls me the most about the email. The email reflects the abuse of small business newsagents by the magazine distributors. Consider these points:
- Most newsagents do not have access to appropriate levers with which to control the amount they will owe Gotch each month.
- Newsagents have to fund retail real estate in store, labour for managing magazines and the freight cost of returning unsold stock.
- Newsagents are billed for product supplied to the end of the month.
- Gotch operates with a ‘fluid’ end of the month for processing returns from newsagents – we are not told when the end of a month will be and can find that we have missed it by a few days and therefore miss needed credits.
It is unfair for a magazine distributor to aggressively pursue newsagents to pay bills on time if they do not provide newsagents with the capacity to manage the amount they will owe.
The current magazine distribution model is unfair to newsagents.

