Joe Hockey is wrong about newsagents
Newsagents and pharmacists are two forever-protected species as far as the coalition is concerned.
This is a quote attributed to Joe Hockey, the former Minister for Small Business in the Howard Government. It’s on Page 12 of the Perspective insert in the Australian Financial Review (Dec 30 – Jan 4).
Joe Hockey and his colleagues demonstrated their commitment to newsagents through their years in office by:
- Facilitating the elimination of exclusive newspaper and magazine distribution territories without compensation for taking away from newsagents this century-old right.
- Driving newsagents to enter into new contracts with publishers and permitting this to be done by newsagents negotiating on their own behalf and not using professional negotiators.
- Allowing poor leadership of newsagents at the time to wipe off more than $100 million dollars of value of newsagent businesses without compensation.
- Permitting a contract relationship for newspapers and magazines which deregulated one side of the transaction and left newsagents with an expensive and inefficient system which was designed for a regulated marketplace.
- Permitting the 865 Government owned Australia Post retail outlets to become more and more like newsagents, moving into areas traditionally serviced well by newsagents.
- Refusing to intervene in 2004 when Australia Post was engaged in what I’d consider grossly unconscionable practices when newsagents tried to establish an alternative bill payment network.
- Refusing to respond to newsagent representations in 2004 about an unfair magazine distribution system which operates at a loss for many newsagents.
Joe Hockey is wrong about newsagents. The Coalition has not demonstrated any concern for newsagents other than hollow words.
That said, we owe our poor handling of deregulation to the two or three newsagents who ran this project on behalf of newsagents. They were not up to the task. The cost of their failure will be felt for years to come.
Footnote: This blog post is not a call for regulation. We needed to move away from the protection of what we had until 1999. However, what we do need is complete deregulation – fair commercial terms around the distribution of newspapers and magazines.
