Why Afterpay is rejecting newsagents as merchants
Plenty of newsagents who have applied to to offer Afterpay in their businesses have been rejected early in the application process.
Afterpay is rejecting these businesses on the basis they sell three product categories that are not permitted under its terms: gambling, tobacco and porn.
While I have made representations on the rejections of which I am aware and explained how problematic products can be fenced off from being paid for through Afterpay, the rejection remains on foot.
The terms established by Afterpay reflect their own business terms and, I suspect, terms imposed by financiers and others with a stake in the Afterpay business. Others in this lending space have similar terms.
Newsagency businesses that are not agents and not convenience focussed have a better chance of overcoming the Afterpay ban.
This all matters because of the commercial value to retailers on the buy now pay later model. Through my work with newsxpress I see plenty of business being won by newsXpress members selling items,ms today that shoppers will pay for over time. This is business that would have gone to other retailers.
There are stores winning click and collect business from shoppers repaired to drive an hour or so to pick up something paid for through Oxipay (like Afterpay), which they could have bought locally but COD or on LayBy.
Once a purchase decision has been made people often want the item(s) immediately. Hence the value of offering this buy now take it now pay later service. This is why the Afterpay rejection needs work.














