As a newsagent and a supplier to newsagents I get to see our channel in action from a range of perspectives. While most engagement I encounter between newsagents and suppliers is positive and respectful, there is the rare occasion of a bad experience and, of course, it’s the experience you remember the most.
Some newsagents, very few in fact, are quick with threats against suppliers if they do not get what they want. They will say that they will tell every other newsagent that your product or service is bad unless you give them what they want. Or they will say they will complain to the association in an effort to have you accede to their request – even if the request is outside your documented trading terms.
It’s my experience that the scope and volume of the threat is the inverse of the facts of the situation. The few times I have seen or heard of this type of blackmail behaviour – I’ll hurt your company unless you give me what I want – the threats started before the dispute was even investigated and the newsagent is seeking something they to which they are not entitled – hence the over the top threats.
I experienced a situation recently, a newsagent emailed me about an issue. I said I was overseas but would rely on my person on the ground to look into it. Minutes later, they replied with an email saying they would never deal with my company again and had reported the matter to the association. The matter had not yet been investigated at my level and the amount in question was fractional compared to the decades-long relationship. They exploded too early and all because I wanted to research their complaint. The matter was complicated by them making the small purchase agreeing to the terms and conditions and the supply meeting these.
There was no other issue between us, no other history other than positive.
Because of their threat I decided to give them what they wanted. I know of other suppliers who have done the same in similar circumstances. We do it because ours is a gossip-fuelled channel where baseless gossip can harm reputations. I understand that giving in feeds the monster. It’s a judgement call that suppliers do all too often find to be necessary … unfortunately. We did this time.
Why write about this? To show that newsagent suppliers from time to time have to deal with situations that the vast majority of newsagents would never know about and to point out that a very small number of newsagents give the broader community a bad name. I also write about this to explain why some suppliers have complex account application and purchase processes.