As I have been writing here for some time, EFTPOS fees are set to increase from October thanks to a decision by EPAL, the organisation created by the Reserve Bank and controlled by the major banks plus Coles and Woolworths. Oh, and I have noted that Coles and Woolowrths are set to not face any fee hike. Why the Reserve Bank would think it is smart to put the big banks and Coles and Woolworths in charge of the cookie jar given their addiction is beyond me. What is even more shocking is that no one in the government is prepared to reasonable engage on this as an issue of concern for small business.
Anyway, I digress.
Yesterday, it was reported that EPAL has changed its position on the impact of its EFTPOS fee pricing decision. Here is what EPAL had said:
Australian consumers should not face new charges to eftpos interchange fees.
Yesterday, the Australian Financial Review reported (page 48) EPAL as saying:
It is therefore premature to state with certainty what impact the planned changes will have on retailers or then upon their consumers.
Click here to read the full EPAL press release containing this quote. Not that it says much. It’s a kind of a cover your backside press release, as if they know what is coming.
I suspect that the EPAL Board, controlled by the big banks plus Coles and Woolworths and realised that the big banks will pass on increased fees and that retailers will either have to either suck these up or pass them on. With the current retail challenges, it’s far less likely that retailers would have the capacity to suck up the EPAL / Bank drives fee increases.
This back down by EPAL is considerable given the battle they have waged over recent months against anyone who has criticised their new fee regime. They have successfully nobbled politicians based on the responses I have seen from local members who have been queried by newsagents about the new interchange fees.
It is not too late for newsagents to engage on this issue. The ANF and a small group of newsagents have. If only more newsagents would.
For background on this issue and a copy of a letter from the ANF which you can use, please click here.