Hearst to launch e-reader and disrupt the supply chain
Fortune overnight reported what could be a game changing move by the Hearst Corporation:
Against a backdrop of plummeting ad revenue for newspapers and magazines, and rising costs for paper and delivery, Hearst Corp., is getting set to launch an electronic reader that it hopes can do for periodicals what Amazon’s Kindle is doing for books.
According to industry insiders, Hearst, which publishes magazines ranging from Cosmopolitan to Esquire and newspapers including the financially imperiled San Francisco Chronicle, has developed a wireless e-reader with a large-format screen suited to the reading and advertising requirements of newspapers and magazines. The device and underlying technology, which other publishers will be allowed to adapt, is likely to debut this year.
The Amazon Kindle, selling more than 300,000 devices last year and probably many more this year thanks to Oprah’s endorsement, has changed book reading for many. The full impact on book sales will not be felt for a couple of years yet. The Hearst move could do the same for newspapers (maybe) and magazines (more likely).
The stories circulating are that the Hearst device will have a bigger screen and be foldable. Both attributes would be crucial for a newspaper or magazine experience.
The device would work by downloading the latest content, to which the customer is subscribed, from the publisher. The supply chain shrinks. The use of paper is eliminated as well as the distribution network including retailers like newsagencies and similar businesses.
Hearst has a track record for investing in disruptive technology. See the announcement from Eink 1998 about Hearst participating in a capital raising for the further development of eink technology. They remain an investor today.
There is considerable coverage of this move by Hearst including the predictable: Can Hearst save newspapers with an e-reader? at PC World. More than 500 blog posts have been published on this in the last 24 hours.
I have been talking about this type of technology for years and see the move by Hearst as inevitable. My concern is that newsagents are not engaged in discussion about this. Indeed, they either do not believe that their model will be disrupted by technology or that existing suppliers will involve them somehow in a new model.
New technology will impact sales of magazines and newspapers. It is already but today’s economic climate is masking the true impact. I would like to see on-going thoughtful (politics free) discussion about this issue among newsagents. While there has been some here over the years and at workshops I have run, there has been little truly useful engagement.
The coverage overnight about the move by Hearst is significant for Australian newsagents. It will be interesting to see if newsagents agree.