For years, Fairfax has taken a back seat on many issues relating to newspaper distribution and home delivery. Through then on/off T2020 discussions, fairfax has publicly said that they will most likely follow the News Limited lead.
Recent events suggest that Fairfax is no longer taking a back seat. Indeed, the company appears to have an new agenda. I have two stories to share.
A newsagent in financial difficulty put their hand up for help. An agreement was reached to quickly sell the business to a larger distribution only operator. News Limited agreed, Fairfax said they would consider it four weeks later. In the meantime, the financial situation of the vendor necessitated an urgent move. The purchasing distribution agent took on the business. Fairfax cancelled the contract, saying they do not recognise the larger distribution business. They handed the territory to another newsagent, a newsagent who will not make money delivering the lower penetration newspaper of the three daily newspapers delivered in this area.
The Fairfax decision does not make sense. It’s a break with how the company has operated for years. It could disadvantage customers. It certainly disadvantages the distribution newsagent as they now have some quite inefficient deliveries to complete – they will be driving down streets being serviced by the other distribution newsagent, a business with a greater distribution density.
The News Limited approach was more commercial. The Fairfax decision seems, from where I sit, to have been political and petty.
Here is the second story.
Fairfax was recently approached by a newsagent who had upgraded to the windows version of their newsagency software to help with what appeared to be a data discrepancy. I’m told fairfax representatives took a copy of the data back to their office, to match it up with the Fairfax data. I’m told Fairfax invoiced the newsagent tens of thousands of dollars based on what they found in the data. The newsagent asked for that issue to be shelved until the newsagent got the original data issue resolved. I’m told Fairfax refused and advised they would not assist in resolving the data issue until the invoice was paid. I’m also told that Fairfax threatened the newsagent with cancellation of the contract.
The newsagent did not pay and I’m told the contract is cancelled as of this week and another local newsagent found to do the deliveries of the Fairfax titles.
These two stories reflect, in my view, a backward step in much needed newspaper distribution consolidation. For years, Victoria led the way forward. Now, it appears, Victoria is leading the way backward in terms of handling Fairfax titles.
Newsagents are left wondering about the Fairfax agenda and whether the company is hell-bent on breaking the newsagent channel. The company certainly seems to be against the larger distribution-only businesses, preferring to deal with smaller independent newsagents for its titles.
I wonder what News Limited makes of all this…