The role of Scooby Doo in hurting the newsagency channel
Newsagents may want to the quantity of Scooby Doo stock received yesterday. In our case supply was increased without justification. Yes, yes, we can early return. We should not have to do this.
I was discussing this with a newsagent late yesterday and they are at their wits end about magazine supply with the cheques they regularly write for the magazine companies equal to or more than the value of sales in the month. And that is without even factoring in the cost of real estate and labour.
Newsagents have complained about the supply model for many years both formally and informally. Millions of dollars have been invested by newsagents to provide magazine distributors with more timely and accurate data with a fairer supply model as one of the promises.
While newsagents can and do early return to manage stock levels and cash flow, there is a limit as to what can be achieved. Plus there is a labour and freight cost with this.
Negative cash flow for magazines is worse today in 2010 than I have seen it in years. It is the extra one and two copies of a title, like Scooby Doo, which is causing real damage as it is under the radar.
I can see a time when newsagents en masse refuse to pay magazine distributors on time and through this exert cash flow pressure of their own.
The better alternative would be for distributors to agree to a fair supply model with penalties for failures on their part – like sending extra copies of Scooby Doo without justification in the sales data. They need to hold themselves as accountable to us as they hold us accountable to them when it comes time to pay the bills and put up displays.
