NDD lawyers pursue this blog
I received further correspondence from NDD’s lawyers today. They are say that my blog post yesterday compounds damage against NDD. They also say that NDD did not lose the Best Bets and Winning Post distribution accounts. My answer to this is that they don’t have the accounts any more so they are ‘lost’ to the business.
They claim that through this blog I demonstrate malice toward NDD. What I want from NDD is what I want from all magazine distributors – fair and equitable magazine supply arrangements for all newsagents. I publish more examples of NDD oversupply because I see more from them than other distributors. If NDD and their lawyers had their way I would not publish examples of repeated gross over supply.
The lawyers have also claim that NDD closed 68 accounts and not the 600 I reported. I have heard from several sources that it was 600 but since NDD through their lawyers say it was 68 I have to accept that.
Rather than using lawyers to pursue this blog, NDD would be better advised to host meetings of newsagents and seek their views on the matters canvassed here. They would soon see that examples I document reflect experiences of others.

