A blog on issues affecting Australia's newsagents, media and small business generally. More ...

Month: November 2006

News and Fairfax contemplate sharing logistics and more

On the surface it makes sense, Fairfax and News sharing trucks for newspaper distribution. It would be good if newsagents could unlock similar rationalisation so that they too could drive costs down and thereby achieve a better return. For example, it would be good is the rules of the newspaper distribution system allowed newsagents to include other products in a bag delivered to a doorstep with a newspaper.

Newsagents in some states have just been permitted their first delivery fee increase in years – these fees are set by publishers. Data suggests that in real terms newsagent compensation for each newspaper home delivered is considerably lower today than prior to deregulation. With newspaper cover prices – a key determinant of newsagent revenue – showing less than CPI increases, newsagents scramble to make more than a meager income from the delivery of newspapers. Hence the need to unlock their local distribution network for the delivery of other products at the same time as delivering the newspaper. The lack of return is one reason more newsagents are exiting from home delivery than at any time in the past.

It would be appropriate, if the discussions between Fairfax and News proceed further, that the ACCC considers the proposal at the same time as conducting a review of the impact of the 1999 deregulation of the distribution of newspapers and magazines overseen by the ACCC at the behest of the Federal Government.

Prior to deregulation, newsagents operated under a territorial system. Deregulation took that away and while we have an appropriately more competitive environment, newsagents ought to have been compensated by the Government for having their exclusivity unilaterally taken from them.

If newsagents were auto workers, farmers or chemists, the Government would most likely have thrown millions their way as it has done regularly to those industries to facilitate restructuring.

While not wanting necessarily to reopen the deregulation can of worms, there is no denying that newsagents did have something valuable taken from them by Government action without compensation.

0 likes
Media disruption

Magazine & newspaper theft prevented with lockable boxes

kronen_zeitung.JPGMissing parcels of newspapers and magazines is expensive. Here’s how they fix it in Vienna – lockable boxes which drivers and store owners have access to by way of a key. Some are title specific and others for general use. The Kronen Zeitung (large daily newspaper) box was supplied by the publisher. These two are not the biggest I saw it the city. I’m told it addressed the theft of parcels delivered overnight.

0 likes
Newsagency challenges

Fairfax cashing in on digital success

fairfax-ifra.JPGMike van Niekerk, Editor in Chief Online of Fairfax Media, delivered an impressive presentation called Cashing in on Digital Success at the Beyond the Printed Word conference in Vienna which ended Friday. It was impressive not only in demonstrating how to leverage excellent revenue from a popular and respected news site but also in the numbers presented as the table on the left shows. The full slideshow presentation is available online at the conference website. Van Niekerk demonstrated the many ways Fairfax is able to generate revenue beyond the traditional banner ads. He listed examples of rich media, over the page, half page, leader board, TVCs and sponsored links and went on to say that their problem was lack of inventory.

What I would like to see from Fairfax and the other publishers who presented at the conference is the income and net return per employee and by capital compared to the print operation. Given that publishers must be driven by share price it is the return which will guide them to the tipping point where the success of the online model, with a lower cost base, forces significant contraction of the print model. Please don’t misunderstand my interest – I am not wanting to talk newspapers down but rather have a better “heads up” when considering capital expenditure related to the sale and distribution of newspapers.

As publishers like Fairfax continue to drive their online operations, newsagents, too, must aggressively pursue new traffic and revenue opportunities. Every day we continue to perform the same tasks with the same revenue model is another day lost to the changing world and to our more forward thinking competitors.

0 likes
Media disruption

Publishers plan for life after newspapers, so should newsagents

blogifra.JPGAs the IFRA Beyond the Printed Word conference wound to an end this afternoon in Vienna I was left with more questions than when the conference began. Publishers I talked with see a rapidly approaching cliff in terms of print sales and ad revenue and some are rushing to find replacement revenue. Some openly say that the paid (over the counter or subscription) newspaper as we know it will be dead, in Europe at least, in a matter of years and will be replaced with an entirely new premium print model. They are the early adopters of new models. They are balanced with others who are yet to treat an online presence other than a poor cousin to the print edition.

Back to the questions I arrived with: Is there a common strategy being adopted by publishers to find sustainable online revenue? Who is doing it well? Will online provide the revenue the shareholders in publishing firms are used to? Do the publishers get it that they are no longer newspaper publishers but, rather, media companies? Is there a place for the current distribution system (newsagents) in their thinking about the future? Do publishers really understand the Internet? Is there a revenue model which can work?

In hindsight the questions were naive in that this is all very new and publishers are learning as they go.

I saw heard about some excellent initiatives – Naples News is one, demonstrating what a newspaper with a circulation of 50,000 can achieve. What they are dong is way advanced on any Australian news site. They created this within a year. Core to their success was them taking the online move seriously from the top down and driving change. Check out their restaurant reviews and sports scores – yeah, the sports side of the side is truly amazing. The power available to the reader makes them the expert thanks to smart organisation of data.

The conference is proof that publishers the world over are taking the online challenge seriously and that print circulation marketing today is more about delaying rapid decline than achieving growth. I know there are publisher executives in Australia who disagree with me. Let’s check in in a year, two years and five years and see if I am right. If we follow the US and European examples sales will fall. However, I accept that our marketplace is different so who really knows when the inevitable change will hit. The keys are broadband take up, lower cost wireless devices and peer pressure. My plea to Australian newspaper publisher executives is – don’t get newsagents investing beyond what is absolutely necessary in and chasing paid circulation growth. Newsagents themselves need to ensure that every capital investment is for their future and not just to help publishers tread water.

Newsagents are middlemen. This makes us servants. We are not part of any publisher’s online strategy. I’m okay with that. Publishers need to do what is right for their shareholders. For our part, newsagents need to see the future and act now. We need to break out of being middlemen. We need to get smart about online. We need new revenue streams and they need this now for it will take years to change the habits of consumers.

Just as publishers have come to conferences like Beyond the Printed Word, so, too, should newsagents congregate and discuss their life after print. This is the biggest challenge in the 120 years our channel has existed.

While I am leaving the conference with more questions than when I arrived I have a better understanding of how publishers see the online opportunity and some of the strategies being employed and for that I am grateful.

0 likes
Citizen Journalism

What do 16 year olds think of online newspaper sites?

blog-16yo.JPG

It’s a brave conference which gets 16 year olds on stage to critique newspaper websites. That’s what happened this morning at the Beyond the Printed Word conference in Vienna. This team of bright 16 years shared their views, warts and all. Here is a selection of their comments:

Ads get in the way of content. They don’t like clicking on a video and having to watch an ad before the video. (You could hear the gasp when they said this.)

Pop up ads are annoying.

Most banner ads are not appealing.

They don’t like sites with too much colour, too much animation or swirling fonts.

Sites need to be easier to navigate.

It is frustrating having to register to get the content you need.

As soon as you are sent to another site, when you click a link, they quit.

Having a dating service on a news site is degrading. It’s useless.

They have a preference for proper news sites as opposed to citizen journalism.

Sites chasing young people should be designed by young people – they can tell when a 40 year old is trying to design young.

Not much interest in using mobile phones to access news. (more mutterings from the audience given many are playing in this space.)

I can’t do the hour long presentation justice here.

Some key take-aways for me were that peer pressure drives site traffic. When asked if they would switch to another social media site most of the 16 year old panel said no unless their friends switched. The big surprise was their strong reaction of advertising and their dislike for paying for anything. This is a huge challenge for any online content site chasing this demographic.

How does this connect with Australian newsagents? Well, we’re chasing this market and since they are buying fewer newspapers than the generation before them, their insights will help determine what we need to do in-store to be attractive to them.

This was an excellent session, most invaluable.

0 likes
Citizen Journalism

Newspaper publishers chasing web 2.0 and a revenue model

ifra.JPGI’m at the Beyond the Printed Word conference in Vienna along with 450 representatives of newspaper publishers from 41 countries. Everyone is here to talk about how newspapers can make money from online plays and retain (and even grow) shareholder value in this rapidly changing world.

Day one has been kind of a show-and-tell event with publishers presenting what they have done. For me, the most interesting presentation today was by Mikal Rohde of Schibsted Sok AS in Norway. In just over a year the Sesam search engine developed and launched by this publisher has become the hit of Norway. In a globalisation sense it gives me heart that there are some who can beat giants. They are playing in a space few other publishers play in yet it is a logical place for a publisher because what is a search engine but an aggregator of content?

From an Australian newsagent perspective, what is most important about day one is what has not been discussed that much – that print is old news. Some people on the floor talk as if print is already buried. No, it won’t go away but, boy, will it go through some changes. Everyone at the conference is focused on moving the publisher brands born in print to the online world and while many speakers discuss how their online strategy is supporting their print model, the reality is that profit will determine how this plays out.

Newsagents need to understand that newspapers will not be the traffic driver to our retail businesses in five years that they are today and even less so in ten years. This is why what we spend on our infrastructure must change not only to draw new traffic but also to de-emphasise newspapers and to not provide them the most expensive real-estate in our stores.

I was surprised at what some companies have achieved with very small teams. Some excellent sites and services have been established with teams of ten or less – in businesses employing thousands in their print operation. I was also surprised that most of the companies so far are talking about almost single online strategies. Okay, these single sites have depth. I would have thought that is they were looking to replace a significant portion of print revenue they would need many online strategies. Connecting with an online consumer is not a once a day event to get the purchase and leave them be as is the case with a newspaper. For many, online consumption is 24/7 while with others it is many times a day through many channels – hence the need for publishers to break out from behind the masthead and connect through these channels.

Back to Norway, I like that Schibsted has created their own search engine. The control this provides will prove invaluable to their future.

Live coverage is available in part as a demonstration of some of the technologies on show.

0 likes
Media disruption

Higher margin on magazines for newsagents in Australia

blogmagcovers.JPG

I was talking with the owner of another newspaper / magazine shop here in Vienna today and I uncovered more of their story. First up, they’re on a lower commission. He wouldn’t say but did say he would be very very happy with 25%. I am guessing they are on 15%, maybe a little more. He saw lower commission as a price to pay for better control over the stock he gets. His biggest problem is not getting enough stock of top selling titles. Yeah, I understand that!

In more of the stores today I say the same horizontal layering of magazines with full-face display for only the very top sellers.

Talking with the owner of one store today about our lack of control over what we carry, he ordered Australian newsagents to “get organised, form a union, take control”. For us to do that we have to believe in ourselves, all of us. Getting 4,500 CEOs on the same page is the biggest challenge newsagents have faced and will always face. I can, however, see it happening with a smaller group.

0 likes
Newsagency challenges

Austrian Post is no Australia Post

austrian_post.JPG

I’ve been into a five post offices today in Vienna and found businesses focused on postal and related products and services. More than 50% of available floor space relates directly to postal products and services. Even their retail products relate – packaging, a small range of cards, envelopes, pens and some writing pads. They look nothing like Post Shops we have in Australia. Queues were not long – the most was four during the lunch rush – and service seemed fast. In two outlets they had some CDs and DVDs but even then the range was very limited – nothing like the 90% floor space for non postal items I see in some Australian Post Shops.

One argument used by Australia Post and its apologists in the Government is that Australia Post needs to sell the non post related items to make ends meet. If that’s the case how is it that Austrian Post is doing very well, according to their Annual Report, without taking business away from independent retailers in the stationery, greeting card and magazine space?

Before a Public Offering in May of this year, Austrian Post was wholly owned by the Austrian privatisation agency ÖIAG. Now, OIAG owns 51%. A full breakdown of the ownership structure is at their website. They have with 1,338 “company owned” branches and 612 “third-party outlets”.

The government has the power to rein in Australia Post but does not. They could provide clarity in defining what Australia Post can do but they do not. They could prove their small business credentials and stop Australia Post turning its stores into newsagencies (with poor service) but they do not. There is a lot the government could learn from a visit to Austrian Post.

0 likes
Australia Post

Magazine publishers and distributors abuse Australian newsagents

vienna-newspapers.JPGNewsstands like this are dotted around Vienna. Further out of the city they become more traditional shops but all carry a similar range of products: newspapers, magazines, confectionery and cigarettes. Usually, only the top ten titles are displayed full face – the rest are fanned along shelves, almost on top of each other with two or three centimeters of the cover showing. Many are displayed this way behind the counter. One news vendor told me this was the tradition. People know what they want and if they don’t he finds it for them. When I asked about browsing he exclaimed – “this is a shop!”.

The newsstand in the photo carries around 750 titles. He chooses what he carries and reviews new titles before deciding if he wants them. He can cut a title at any time. Being in the city with many tourists means a broader range suits him.

Range is a critical issue for Australian newsagents – our lack (or perceived lack) of choice in the magazine titles we carry. We have been conned with a half pregnant deregulation and have not been smart on how to deal with such a biased and broken system. Magazines in the top 100 are fine, I am happy with them and my cut from the cover price. My issue is with titles outside the top 100. Like these newsstands in Austria we need the right to choose the titles we carry. Magazine distributors need to advise details of new titles before they are shipped and we need the ability to set our own supply level. The alternative I see to this is that newsagents charge a weekly flat fee for handling titles, based on the quantity of a title received, for each week of the on-sale period. Of course, we could consider a higher margin for low volume titles but I’d rather see the margin remain the same and us compensated for the assets we bring to the table regardless of sales success.

Every minute and every dollar newsagents spend on titles outside the top 100 – many of which have a sell through of 40% or less – is a minute and a dollar less available for the top selling titles, the titles delivering customers to the shop and good sales growth.

Newsagents are kidding themselves with the current system. We are being abused by some publishers and compliant magazine distributors who often get paid regardless of whether a title sells. The sooner we take control of our magazine real-estate and labour assets and run them like a business the better. The sooner we manage the range in our stores the sooner we will start to increase magazine sales.

My friend in Vienna was surprised to hear how many newsagents there are in Australia and how the magazine supply model works. He laughed at how easy it was for publishers to get “rubbish” into the shops. As I walked away I thought he was probably laughing at me too.

0 likes
magazines

Newspapers and news in Vienna

vienna-newsstand.JPG

Even though I don’t read German I picked up a cross-section of local newspapers from Vienna and neighboring European countries. The difference between these and newspapers I saw in London is stark. More news focus. No giveaways, today at least. Less entertainment coverage. I was talking with concierge at the hotel about it and his comment said it all – Newspapers are supposed to be about news aren’t they? yes they are.

0 likes
Newspapers

Smart stationery retailing in London

ryman.JPGWhile newsagents are retreating from the high street, stationery outlets are strong. Take Ryman for example. They have an excellent range, well laid out and provide a clear value proposition, a mix of price and service, to the browser. Sure they are part of a big group. It doesn’t feel like it in the store. For example, I visited at least ten WH Smith stores (newspapers, magazines, greeting cards, books and stationery) and received consistently mediocre service. The employees looked unhappy and acted unhappy. (I stood in a line for 5 minutes, got to the counter and was greeted with yes please – geez, no smile, no greeting). I visited three Ryman stores and found the opposite. Happy employees who seem to actually want to serve you.

Standing in one of the Ryman stores I got to thinking about how we do stationery in my newsagency and many of Australia’s newsagencies. At Ryman I feel better serviced through range and price. The store encourages browsing. Yet it’s small – certainly the ones I went to. Their Christmas display was bold and enjoyable. Then I think of stationery in my shop – it’s cold, unappealing and reminiscent of work. The Ryman approach makes stationery, work, enjoyable. This is what got me browsing the store. I walked out and sat in a coffee shop (drinking bad London coffee) and made notes, plenty of notes.

Many newsagents are getting stationery wrong, me included. We get it wrong on range, theatre and the value proposition. Even though stationery is one department newsagents fully control, few of us exert that control. It’s the poor cousin to newspapers, lotteries, magazines and greeting cards. In many newsagencies the range and merchandising approach has not changed in more than 20 years. We need to be proud and bold stationers. We need to leverage our geographic asset better than we do today.

These Ryman stores are a real eye-opener. They have demonstrated how to do stationery well in a small space.

0 likes
Newsagency challenges

The Age goes tabloid, for the Melbourne Cup

I’ve heard that The Age today came out inside a tabloid wraparound for the Melbourne Cup – confusing many customers. Luke from my newsagency tells me:

Dozens (literally) of customers have been confused by this and have been ready to walk out of the shop thinking that there are no Ages. Everyone is confusing them for the Sun and being disappointed. Vice versa, a lot of people are throwing $1.10 at the counter and walking out with Ages.

Some people are excited that The Age has gone tabloid, then disappointed when they open it and it is still broadsheet.

I suspect the reaction encountered at my shop is not dissimilar to elsewhere. It sounds like a Melbourne Cup promotion gone wrong. Newspaper customers are habitual, they like their newspaper just so every day. The Age pushes the envelope – today with the tabloid wrap-around look and other days with their awful post-it type note ads in the middle of the masthead.

0 likes
Newspapers

Independent newsagents have all but given up in London

blogjamesnews.JPGI am surprised at the difference in London newspapers today compared to yesterday. Today they are normal compared to yesterday’s bloated and gimmick based products. The only exception is The Times – every copy comes with a book. At Starbucks it was a children’s book. At WH Smith it was a book about houses and working out their history.

It seems that the independent newsagents have all but given up. James News, shown in the photo, is the best I have seen out of 30 or 40 in the last two days in terms of branding. Most allow newspaper publishers to control the branding putting mastheads ahead of the store’s brand and or value proposition. At least James News shows their name. I am surprised that all these independents have not at least got together to trade under a common brand of some sort. Without the profile of a common brand they will continue to face.

On the outside independent newsagents look nondescript. Inside they many feel like a mausoleum. Shelves are barely stocked, ranges are poor. If they sell cards they are cheap. Most have 50 or 100 magazine titles. Snack foods and drinks dominate. I appreciate it’s different out of the City, but it’s still not a patch on what we have back in Australia.

We’re lucky to have newsagencies in Australia. They are unique. Consumers have access to a range or magazines and event stationery it’s hard to find elsewhere. Publishers and other suppliers have access to a traffic-rich and low cost to access retail network with reasonable compliance. We’re clearly doing something right in Australia to have the network we have. Let’s not kill it.

0 likes
Newsagency challenges

Free newspapers in London make selling newspapers tougher

bloglondonpaper.JPG

It’s hard to walk any of London’s major streets in the afternoon without being offered a copy of the london paper – the free newspaper launched by News International eight weeks ago. Strategically located distributors (often outside a supermarket or convenience store) stand next to the trademark purple umbrella and thrust the newspaper in front of anyone walking within a few feet of their position. Today’s 40 page edition feels nothing like the free commuter papers I am used to – MX in Melbourne and Sydney. Indeed, comparing it page by page with the Evening Standard (50 pence) it’s a very competitive offering. Sure it provides more celebrity and fashion coverage than hard news but the key news stories are well covered. Mind you, the Standard had its fare share of celebrity coverage.

I also picked up a copy of London Lite, a free daily launched ten weeks ago by Associated Newspapers and distributed throughout the City. It’s from the publishers of the Evening Standard. London Lite today is 48 pages long. It shares key stories with the Standard and in a couple of instances today, provided more detail than its paid for stable-mate. Maybe I am missing something but I don’t get the strategy of giving away a product which is 75% of your paid-for product – unless it’s an advertising play, assuring advertisers of a certain number of eyeballs you can only deliver through a free version. London Lite is playing in the user generated content space and carries some content provided by readers.

These free London newspapers are very different to MX, the only capital city free daily in Australia. They read as if they are targeting a broader demographic than that of MX.
By creating such good free offerings, publishers are presenting a product which must cannibalise the market for newspapers with a cover price.

As one who relies on consumer habits to purchase newspapers I’d be unhappy if free newspapers like these two from London came to Australia. However, I suspect it is only a matter of time. People don’t have the time for bigger newspapers. When sales are flat or fall I am sure publishers will use the learnings from London and the many other cities where free daily newspapers are a key part of their consumer offering.

Newsagents I talk to are not concerned about MX. They see it as not competing with anything they offer. The two free newspapers in London which I have seen today would compete and that’s what newsagents need to be aware of and, maybe, plan for.

0 likes
Media disruption

London’s overweight and addicted newspapers would be unrecognizable to their founders

bloguknews1.JPGI am amazed at how fat London newspapers are on a Saturday and Sunday. Have they been to the McDonalds management school of bigger is better? It’s not, of course. These bulging newspapers are packed with too many sections, recycled content and ads, for my liking – too many ads. A good newspaper does not need to be supersized. A good newspaper needs good news coverage. The London newspapers I have seen seem to think that size does matter.

They are drug addicted as well. Hooked into giveaways because they cannot get the desired circulation without a bribe. The addiction I saw when here a year ago is as evident today. The Mail gave me a DVD of Mrs Santa Claus, The Sunday Times gave me a CD-ROM Family Tree Maker, The Daily Express gave me free Christmas Cards (but I had to go to Superdrug to redeem those) and The Sunday Telegraph gave me free Hybrid Tea Roses – if I send in a coupon and pay the postage.

Yesterday (Saturday) The Times gave me a DVD – Who Do You Think You Are – an episode of the BBC series of the same name.

Tomorrow, the Daily Mail starts a part series of Disney PC Games. How this works is that you buy the newspaper anywhere but can only redeem the coupon for the 12 parts at WH Smith or Eason stores. Given the UK market I can understand publishers limiting redemption to selected branded stores. Looking at this campaign, and considering all the others, one has to acknowledge the deep addiction of publishers to these giveaways in an effort to attract sales. My question is – who is going to stage an intervention and break the habit of the publishers? Certainly in Australia, unless the scale out model of the giveaways gets smarter, intervention to kill the addiction is essential because poor scale out is losing customers, not gaining them. Here in London the problem is more serious – these aren’t newspapers. There are advertising wrap-arounds. If I were a regular consumer I’d avoid them – their covers have little or no news appeal.

But back to London. The newspapers seem to have lost their way, lost their purpose as a respected source of news and analysis. Sure, news and analysis are still there, but in the background.

My simple view is that newspaper publishers need to learn that size does not matter, they need to drop these supersized editions. Smart advertisers will be telling them this anyway. Newspaper publishers ought to consider on working on the product to lure customers rather than negotiating a bribe. Yeah, it’s the hard road. But aren’t they the most rewarding?

0 likes
Newspapers

Drowning in porn magazines

I’m helping a newsagent chase down a cash-flow problem and have identified porn magazines as part of the cause. Titles such as Club International, Exotic Asian Pack, Playboy, Men Only, Weird Sex Letters and Best of Readers Wives are cash-flow negative for as far back as I can see.

Blind freddy knows that the printed porn market is in rapid decline, everyone it would seem except the publishers and distributors who use the low/no cost newsagent network to promote their brands.

I’m not a prude, far from it – these titles have to go. The data shows that newsagents are oversupplied with porn titles. This same data is available to the magazine distributors. There is no justification for the quantity or range currently supplied to all but a few newsagencies.

The flip side of the cash-flow work for the newsagent I am working with the extraordinary contribution of the major titles: Woman’s Day, New Idea, Better Homes and Gardens, NW, Australian Women’s Weekly, Who, TV Week. This is where is makes his money on magazines yet it is the non top sellers which drain labour, real-estate and cash.

0 likes
Newsagency challenges

Sensis launches Autotrader classifieds title nationally – chasing browsers or buyers?

I am curious about the move by Telstra owned Sensis to bring their West Australian title, Autotrader, to the rest of the country. When sales of other classifieds magazines are in deep decline and the Sensis flagship print title Trading Post is flat in some areas and in free fall in others why bring another print classifieds product in? Given the focus on dealer ads, I don’t see this as a print only play. Autotrader is more likely to be an extra value offer to online advertisers. List in Yellow Pages and other Sensis online properties and get into Autotrader as part of the deal. It makes sense to me – being online and in print.

For newsagents Autotrader is grabbing space on crammed shelves and using the low cost newsagent channel to give the title retail presence. I suspect that Sensis knows what newsagents know – the vehicle section of a newsagency is the most popular for browsers. Blokes spend anything from ten minutes to an hour browsing the magazines – classifieds magazines especially. You see them look through and note down contact details for cars which interest them.

The cynic in me says this is a browser play by Sensis – a shopper browser play. Getting into newsagencies they get Autotrader browsed. I doubt you’ll see Autotrader in petrol, convenience and supermarket outlets because in those places people don’t browse magazines.

Newsagents ought to be paid for real-estate and labour invested in titles which do not generate a profitable return. Sensis ought to compensate newsagents for making their advertising successful without the need for a punter to purchase the title.

Newsagents allow this situation by not being commercial and placing a value on their real-estate and labour. Good luck to Sensis for exploiting this.

0 likes
Media disruption

Flooding in communication

Adding up faxes, emails, phone calls and visits, more than seventy unexpected unscheduled time consuming requests of this newsagent this week. Seventy. On top of that is the usual work central to being a good newsagent. The requests ranged from a request to do a special display to a request for complex data. Every one took time which, generally speaking, was not allowed for in the staff roster.

While I am happy to support any supplier supporting my business, it is imperitive that ad hoc requests are more structured and and made with consideration for the time being invested in newsagencies across the country.

0 likes
Newsagency challenges

Newsagents need strong open and effective leadership

Crikey yesterday carried more of my earlier story here about the mess going on within the state and national newsagent associations. The battle between the states and the national body is part personal between a few men, part about leadership and part about good governance and transparency.

Newsagents have the structure and leadership they have voted for (or not as the case may be). The reality is that unless all parties find a way to work together and demonstrate respect for each other, the channel will be lost as there will be no national voice on the issues that matter and that will eliminate the strength of any state based voice.

Newsagent associations Boards agreed on a national unity strategy just a few months ago. All Directors would be well advised to revisit what they agreed to and to reaffirm their support for this. This means putting the personality politics aside and focusing on the needs of the newsagents in the trenches doing it tough every day. Good leadership is what is really needed and that will only come with fresh blood at the Board table.

UPDATE: (9:15PM) The ANF announced this afternoon that it has withdrawn from the agreed co-existence model with the state associations in NSW and QLD. The challenge is how all stakeholders react from here. Newsagents need strong visionary leadership. They have not had this to this point.

0 likes
Newsagency challenges

Leveraging the Lottery superdraw traffic boost

blogtattssuper.GIFIn the majority of newsagencies around the country traffic is up this week thanks to the $21 million superdraw. I know in my own situation, today will be up between 10% and 15% and tomorrow at least 20%. This is one of the six or seven planned superdraws each year, meaning that it would be easy for other suppliers to build offers around this traffic boost. That’s what I’d like to see in 2007 – other suppliers using knowledge of the superdraw dates to create additional revenue opportunities for themselves and newsagents. The bonus traffic is there so why not make use of it? We have offers ourselves but something driven by a publisher would be better as it connects more appropriately with the newsagent offering.

0 likes
Newsagency challenges

Nicole queen of the weeklies

Sales this week of New Idea and Woman’s Day shold confirm the pulling power of Nicole Kidman. While other celebs rise and fall in pulling power, there is nothing like a Nicole Kidman cover to deliver strong sales. It’s been a strong first four days of this week – especially people buying both titles.

0 likes
magazines

Greeting card sale graphically highlights the successful categories

Our landlord gave us ten days to quit the temporary location of our second shop in advance of opening in a permanent location next month so we decided on a sale. Below is a picture of the main card aisle with one day to go. The image graphically illustrates the most sought after card categories. The empty pockets make me wonder about the cost of real-estate and stock on the pockets with stock remaining.

blogcards.JPG

DSC01711.JPG

If cards are not selling when they have been discounted 30% and then 50% then one has to question whether we should have them in the first place. Of course, every retailer wants every item to be the fastest mover. I appreciate that is not practical. However, the many empty pockets in the women’s section versus almost no empty pockets in the men’s makes me want to cut back on men’s titles. Cards stock needs to turn at least three times a year in a shopping centre to pay for the real-estate. The titles left after steep discounts are the titles not performing.

1 likes
Greeting Cards