Buried in Mark Day’s piece in The Australian on Monday speculating that Lachlan Murdoch may take over from his dad as Chairman of News Limited is this when he is writing about new News Limited boss Kim Williams:
He sees a need to reinvent the way newspapers are delivered and sold, which means a new approach to relationships with the newsagency business – protected from competition for more than half a century.
Seriously Mark? I am shocked that you would have the audacity to write that. It is grossly inaccurate I am disappointed that News Limited would bless the publishing of such a misleading statement, unless they have done so because it serves another purpose for the organisation.
Newsagents are not protected.
News Limited ushered in a new relationship with newsagents in 1999 when the Howard conservative government ushered in deregulation of the distribution of newspapers and magazines, stripping newsagents of the protection of the monopoly system created by the publishers decades earlier.
Mark Day would know this so why would he write what he did?
News Limited started changing its relationship further with newsagents around three years ago. Some changes have been implemented and the newsagency channel waits for more changes due in the coming months.
News Limited has financially punished newsagents by not increasing cover price in line with CPI and refusing permission for newsagents to pass on reasonable fuel and other cost rises in delivery fees. The end result is that newsagents in the home delivery business have become the working poor, often making less than minimum wage … and sometimes delivering newspapers which do not meet occupational health and safety requirements. So, not only is the pay for some below what could be paid an employee, the work is sometimes unsafe.
The cover price of the Daily Telegraph has not changed in fourteen years. How is this protection?
Yet Mark Day prefers to make out that newsagents are protected.
Over recent years, News Limited has entered into agreements with non newsagents to take over business won and nurtured by newsagents. I have written here before about News taking delivery business from hotels, business newsagents won from their own hard work. How is this protection?
Newsagents are not protected and have not been for thirteen years.
I am disappointed that Mark Day has written and The Australian published such a false and ignorant statement. Maybe that they did speaks to how they see newsagents in the future.
Will The Australian publish a retraction? I doubt it. Will newsagents complain? I doubt it. We will be too scared that they may take more business from us.
I have read and re-read the Day article and the contentious passage several times. He seems to be inferring that new News Limited CEO is the person to break our “protection” and thereby reinvent the distribution of newspapers. If I am wrong maybe Day or someone at News can comment here and explain how. They won’t – but I leave the opportunity there for them.
News has to understand that thousands of families of newsagents and their employees are on tenterhooks about the future of newspaper distribution. This statement by Day and published in The Australian serves to heighten their anxiety and disrespects decades of service which has benefited the bottom line of the company enormously.
UPDATE: (5:45PM) The ANF has issued a statement this afternoon about this. Click here to see a copy.