Here is the pain of a long on-sale magazine
Publishers should read about the impact a long on-sale for a poorly performing title can have on a newsagency.
We have had Summer Shape Up from Women’s Health & Fitness on sale in one of my newsagencies for two months. We have not sold a copy. The publisher wants us to keep the title for another four weeks. Based on our rent, this title has already cost us $12. Add to this a labour cost and a cost for the cash outlay.
This is a problem for newsagents. It is why we do not like titles with a long on-sale and which are not covering their cost and generating profit for us.
In this newsagency I need to make $6 GP per magazine pocket per month just to cover rent. If I am not getting that return from a magazine profit, the magazine in the pocket becomes loss making for me.
Now there are some who will say that I can’t look at it that way and that it is not fair to expect a single pocket to be profitable. Hmm, tell that to Coles or Woolworths. It’s how they assess the performance of products in their businesses.
Publishers who want to use my space for more than 30 days should back their request by financially covering me if their product fails to perform even at the most minima requirement level.
With various changes to be magazine distribution model being discussed and considered – margin, full copy returns versus covers, on-sale period, target sales efficiency – we need to ensure that all factors are considered in any discussion / negotiation for to make progress on one and not another could be a pyrrhic victory.













