Check out the range of bagged poolside titles from Universal Magazines on the shelves of one newsagency in Melbourne at the moment.
Is this oversupply? I think so. Especially given that there are other pool titles out with fresh and more easily browsed (i.e. not bagged) content – who needs this recycled product which can only be re-sent because it did not sell the first time around..
Is this fair supply? No, not having what looks like three different packs on the shelf on the sale time. Not given that space is in high demand in newsagencies. Not given the terms under which newsagents are supplied with magazines.
What would Universal say? They would say that I am unfairly targeting them, that they supply titles which sell and that shoppers like the value offered in bagged titles. They would also say that newsagents should look at other publishers who send out bagged titles to take up newsagent space.
I encourage newsagents to check their shelves to see if they have these titles and consider whether the titles justify their space. If I was this newsagent and sales were not justifying the space I’d be early returning covers.
Universal Magazines and other publishers need to know that they are judged by newsagents on their actions and not how they compare to others. In this instance, the Universal Magazines supply model which they talk up appears to have not worked.
Representatives from Universal and newsagents are welcome, as always here, to comment.