Behind the decision to change magazine delivery days
I have spoken to a few people about the cutback in magazine distribution from three days a week to two to try and understand more about the move. While no one I spoke with is prepared to go on the record, here’s what they say about the move:
- Planning began long before Bauer purchased ACP and before the management changes at Gotch.
- Money is at the core of the cutback in distribution days – the profits of Gotch and Network.
- Gotch and Network have been on the same page, pursuing a reduction in days as a means of cutting their costs.
- The ANF was consulted – they were told magazine volume was declining while costs were fixed. Apparently they did not request data to confirm the accuracy of this assertion. Volume has not declined as much as the distributors claim.
- No discussion took place between the ANF and distributors about the impact on sales cycles in newsagents nor traffic flow on different days of the week.
- Plenty of magazine publishers, large and small, are unhappy with the move. Mid size and small publishers feel helpless because of what they call a magazine distribution duopoly.
- In deciding on Monday and Thursday, they had to choose days that worked with sales based replenishment (if they ever get it working) and provide a reasonable spread apart to serve the needs of the major weeklies on Monday and Who at the end of the week.
- The overall move and most other decisions have been taken to serve the needs of Gotch and Network.
Personally, I am not against the move necessarily. I understand that businesses need to cut costs. However, I remain concerned about the potential impact for newsagencies versus supermarkets.
On the need to cut costs – it disgusts me that Gotch and Network use this as their reason yet they do not provide newsagents with reasonable ability to achieve cost cutting in magazine supply. This move is another example of do what I say and I will stop you doing what I do.


















