Newsagents are spending between 1% and 2% of magazine sales revenue to return stock which has failed to sell.
With around 90% of the returns freight cost relating to full copy returns, it would be appropriate for newsagents to research whether they are contractually obliged to return full product.
Take the Network Services / ACP relationship with newsagents. The ACP contract outlines our returns obligations for ACP titles. I am not aware of any such obligation for the return of non ACP product to Network Services.
It appears to me that newsagents could return non ACP product which has failed to sell as topped. Such a move would dramatically cut the cost of returns freight. For Network alone, some newsagents could save between $1,500 and $2,000 a year.
I am not advocating this. Newsagents need to do their own research, make up their own minds. Given that the cost of returns is such a contentious issue I would have thought that at least one of the newsagent associations would already have legal advice for newsagents on this.
The alternative is that newsagents are paid a fee for handling full copy returns. A fair fee would be in the range of twenty cents to forty cents per copy. Magazine distributors charge such a fee to publishers for full copy returns so why not newsagents?
As it is, we pay to return magazines which have failed to sell and sometimes find these same failed titles being sent to us again. And again!
So, Gotch, Network and magazine publishers, what is it?
- Pay a fee to newsagents for full copy returns.
- Accept top only returns for product which has failed to sell.
It is time for those who control magazine allocations to take a fair share of the risk.
In the meantime, newsagents need to consider whether they check their contracts and act on the high cost of full copy returns.