Month: August 2007

The special 15th anniversary edition of Who out today is the first post-transition issue following the acquisition of the title last month by Pacific Magazines. The additional point of sale material to support the special edition is welcome.

There is a real opportunity with the new energy directed at Who by the folks at Pacific to drive traffic and sales on a Friday. Hopefully, newsagents will get behind the title with bold in-store display. The more we do this across the channel the more attention we will get from Pacific. Tapping into their integrated TV campaign would be excellent for newsagents.

I see Who as an opportunity to refresh the store for weekend traffic and to underscore our relevance as the destination for magazines.

I was on a flight from Brisbane to Melbourne yesterday and noticed the passenger next to me reading a magazine purchased from a newsagency using software from my company – the barcode label was the giveaway. While reading the magazine my fellow traveler took out the subscription card and started to fill it in. I couldn’t resist and asked why they would subscribe rather than buy at the newsagency. The answer was simple – because they like the title and the newsagent does not always have stock.

I talked about putaways and it appears that her particular newsagency is not a fan. Putaway magazines are not professionally labeled, there is no SMS message sent when a title comes in – in all the process turned her off using it. The title in question is small in circulation but there is not a problem getting supply. A good putaway service would have retained the customer.

My new friend completed the subscription form and planned to post it today.

The independence of newsagencies is a strength, for us as individuals, and a weakness, collectively. The lack of a national consistent putaway program must lose us customers every day if what I say of the flight yesterday is anything to go by.

I am sure the newsagent has their reasons for not pursuing putaways. My view is that there is no choice – putaways are unique to our channel, we own them. Any one of us not offering a professional putaway service weakens all newsagencies and leads to regular customers turning to subscriptions.

I have been told about a retailer in Melbourne pitching a three magazines for the price of two offer. The free magazine is the cheapest of the three bought. The promotional signage in the shopping centre indicates this is a limited time offer.

I am surprised to see such steep discounting of magazines – I wonder if it is a thought through strategy or a knee jerk reaction to address a traffic problem.

Magazines are not bought on price. Loyalty to a retail outlet is not likely to be won by this deep discount deal.

We are responding to the considerable press coverage being given to the housing affordability issue by creating this column of magazines next to our usual placement for The Bulletin, Time, Newsweek and The Monthly.

We are creating a special header to draw attention to the relevance of Money, Your Mortgage, Property Investor and Australian Property to the issue of housing affordability.

In a week or so, when we have the space, we plan on duplicating this display next to our newspaper stand – in an effort to demonstrate the range and relevance of magazines connected with such a topical issue.

While we are not expecting a huge sales kick from this work, we see small steps like this as essential to underscoring the breadth of range of magazines in our newsagency. It is not enough to have the range on the shelves and hope that customers will delve deep into the shop and browse.

By focusing on housing affordability we are connecting with a current and personally relevant issue. The same approach worked when we focused on healthy eating and living a few months back.

It is disappointing to see the folks at Fisherman and Boatowner have another crack at newsagents this month with a full page ad luring people to subscribe. While I acknowledge it is their right to make such a pitch, it concerns me that they do so in terms which make newsagents out to be the bad guys. Newsagents make 25% off the cover price for each issue we sell.

For our 25%, $1.98 per issue sold, we provide shelf space to display the product, labour to unpack, price and put the product on the shelf, labour to process returns, the cost of cash to fund the stock and the cost of shrinkage. I get two copies a month and sometimes sell both, sometimes one and sometimes none. If I sell both I break even.

The discount offered for direct subscription is 37.7%. Maybe the publisher could consider more equitable terms for newsagents rather than trying to cut us off.