The Australian Woodworker publisher turns back on newsagents
Check out what the publisher of The Australian Woodworker has published in the latest issue of the magazine. They infer newsagents have cut their title from the mix of magazines they carry. I wonder if this is what they have been told or whether they have other evidence of this.
They also claim that there are new newsagents who do not appreciate the interest in woodworking.
If I were them I’d want supply and return data by newsagency for the last three years. I’d also want to know how many newsagencies have specifically cut the title versus how many are no longer supplied because of sales performance of the title and a cut therefor by the magazine distributor allocations system.
A better approach for the publisher would have been to engage with newsagents, to educate us about the title and to invest in driving traffic to the channel.
Their decision to go the other way, and promote only a direct subscription relationship will only encourage more newsagents to look at not stocking the title.
I’d urge the publisher to retract their statement and engage directly with newsagents:
- Provide collateral (real or downloadable) with which to promote the title.
- Provide einside information on who is the likely reader and how to sell to them.
- Be clear on where the title should be placed in a newsagency.
- Make a commercial offer to encourage newsagent support.
- List newsagent stockists on your website.
- Talk up newsagents in the magazine.
- Tell newsagents how you support them.
Newsagencies are businesses. Every magazine pocket has to pay its way. To achieve this, we need publishers to actively support our channel as the magazine specialist channel at ever opportunity. We need collateral with which to promote titles. We need publishers engaged with us commercially.
Publishers who do nothing to support the channel can expect nothing in return.














