Network Services sent us 20 copies of Cook Fast, a cookbook published under the Weight Watchers brand (not connected with the Australin Weight Watchers magazine). I questioned the supply at the time as we did not have any space for this unexpected arrival.
Last week, we took all 20 copies off the shelf having actively promoted the title at the counter and with newspapers as well as in with food titles. Not one copy sold.
In addition to having to pay to process the returns, we had to find the retail real estate, the labour creating displays and the cash given the model of paying for all stock supplied and then claiming a credit for returns.
We need a model which offers fair compensation for titles which do not achieve a minimum sell-through rate. I’d suggest a 50% sell-through is fair. Titles which achieve less than this should be paying their way. I would have some exceptions such as selected Australian small publisher titles we want to support for diversity of range.
Cook Fast looks like a cheap magazine, made up of material repurposed from elsewhere. While this may not be the case, it is what it looks like to me and I am a food magazine consumer. It does not have the quality of the AWW cookbooks which sell for $3.00 less.
If I had been given the courtesy of being asked whether I wanted the title I would have said yes to three or four copies, enough to fill a pocket. Since I was not given this courtesy and the title failed abysmally, someone needs to be financially accountable. Since my relationship is with network Services, I blame them.
To send twenty copies at a time when newsagents are being loaded with new and reissued food titles is poor behaviour by Network Services. While I am sure they will have an excuse, I won’t buy it. They have an obligation to treat newsagents fairly, with respect. The supply model for Cook Fast, based on my own experience, did not respect newsagents at all.
As I have written here many times previously, newsagents need a magazine czar, someone who controls what titles get access to our national retail network. Magazine distributors get it wrong too often and newsagents end up paying the price.
So I have written my piece and I feel a little better. Nothing will change. Newsagents will blame distributors. Distributors will blame newsagents and publishers. No one accepts responsibility for the failure of a title. Well, actually, that’s not true. Newsagents accept responsibility because they are contractually bound to do so. This is the unfairness of the current Australian magazine distribution model.
There, now I feel better.